Labels

Showing posts with label World Issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World Issues. Show all posts

Sunday, October 10, 2021

Jacob B Is the "Cult Leader" of the Propagenda Against wwwarea/Another-Realm


Note that "cult leader" is a slight joke I think.

Jacob B is also known as Tribond Kuba, Golf for Life, eneloop1, and many more usernames. He has had an agenda (mainly propaganda) against "wwwarea" or "Another-Realm" for multiple years. He continues to this day as the biggest stalker against him. He's been banned so many times from DeviantArt that I have forgotten what his original ban even was for, assuming I knew before.

He is known for insulting me, harassing me directly, threatening illegal activity against an article (that was also from him) exposing his disgusting behavior, and is likely against furries enjoying anthropomorphic characters that are less human than what he's used to. He himself has an obsessive dragon fetish and judging by some favorites that he usually has a pattern of, he appears to be into inflation, giant breasts, and even some cases of vore (likely tamed down safe vore). He's basically a furry against certain furries, showing how much of a sh*t stain the "furry fandom" usually is.

He has had a history of direct harassing, less direct harassing, insults (as I already said), and has done many other certain bad things. Judging by the evidence, he's not only part of the 'agenda' or 'propaganda' (that he and some other claims to not exist) against me, but he might as well be considered the biggest of them of all. Some people who was part of the propaganda has actually moved on and one of them even claims to apologize for being part of it as well. However, Jacob B has never quit, and he's been obsessed for as long as way back in likely 2017. He keeps on trying to ruin me online, and still refuses to move on from me to enjoy a lawful life, and despite the consequences he's gotten, he still appears to not understand them.

Examples of such propaganda has already been exposed at the other article, but I might as well post some here as well as the main focus. Here are a few with no date order for the whole thing:



At this point, most of his YouTube channel is intended to target me, at the time of this writing likely.

Note the right folder.

Him admitting that he's against me with some of my specific speech.

Of course, those examples are the tip of the iceberg and as I already mentioned in the past, he's also been attempting to contact me online through different accounts, including him bypassing block systems and bans on DeviantArt. He has many debunked beliefs against me, and he can't seem to be reasoned with by me no matter how I try it so far. A lot of the information and some of my arguments can be found on that other article I've linked to.

I may not be a legally defined psychologist, despite that, I honestly think this is signs of an actual illness.

Friday, August 27, 2021

JaredtheFox92 Is an Abusive Disgusting Person

 


I can't believe nobody bothered making an article about this lunatic. This person has been harassing different users (usually via snapshot "callout" posts) and has been dangerously giving out false information toward some users. For example, the person started drama with a person that liked anthropomorphic specific dogs, has uploaded a screenshot on DeviantArt against the person (a form of harassment) and even tried acting as if the person was into bestiality for preferring "vore" fantasies over at least one (not so sure) sapient emotional dog. That's just the tip of the iceberg...

I've dealt with this user for so long, and this person has been causing so much drama. He's also likely friends with a person that has directly harassed me from times I can't count, and that person he's friends with has also threatened illegal activity. They both have been talking to each other against me. Recently, the person has been falsely claiming I "slandered" the person over a silly joke comment I've made as a way of telling the person to f*** off (who was also attacking me for my preference involving anthro wolf fantasy stuff), and now recently this person has been flat-out falsely accusing me that I accused him (JaredtheFox92) as someone who abuses animals. I feel that this person is desperate about trying to get rid of me ever since I made a political opinion about prisons and certain victimless outlets and ever since I exposed further of the person for his past that he shows no regret of.

Whenever some people ask him for proof of a lot of stuff, he usually acts like he doesn't need proof, so of course he refuses to even try with that.

This person has a mentally derange mindset who refuses to take any criticism from what I know. This person is a narcissist that probably can't even handle the most basic form of criticism and has twisted so much stuff up. He's been acting like a lunatic trying to get away with his horrible behavior with little to no proper consequences.

Examples of Bad Behavior

Note: A lot of these usually involves false statements that JaredtheFox92 has stated.

Section 1 | False Statements

Note: Some were in response to existing things from me.

Him claiming that I want certain criminals out just so they can offend again (trying to reference highlighted text).

Claiming that I am advocating sexual crimes.

Flat out claiming that I accused JaredtheFox92 as someone who abuses animals. He even defends it because he thinks zoophilia and bestiality is the same (saying this because of a part-ironic joke comment involving his fetish for at least one anthro fox). He denies the evidence that it's not. 

Him defending it and making a bunch of empty claims without evidence.

 

I have no words of what to describe this.




 

Claim that "wwwarea" is "harassing".



He's claiming that I think christians are nazies, over a picture of a specific church I've made years ago.





Falsely saying that I "harass", "blackmail", and "slander", and "stalk" anyone who gives Alpha and Omega (that this derange person thinks it's bad as objective probably) a bad review. He also falsely claims I "attacked" Bobsheaux and "Raven" (who actually did personally attacked me, and tried promoting suicide for thousands), and also falsely claims that I tried to "demonetize" them. He also falsely claims I "attacked" Dumbsville. Those claims he said is all false, and he has no evidence to back his delusional claims up. Note he thinks disagreeing with a few critics is the same as "attacking" judging by the fact that he said that involving Dumbsville for likely things like this and this. By the way, here's something interesting.

Not only yet another claim(s) but just flat out personally attacking the person for defending a fictional movie he doesn't like. Basically kinda like "STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE." in this.

Before he claimed "I" "slandered" him. What a f*cking hypocrite. This cannot be hidden!

It's really funny and sad that the person went out of his way to accused me as someone that "slandered" by part joking that he's a zoophilia for his furry fox fetish (which BTW, didn't work), yet he's OK with saying things like this. Also need to point out that he may have victimized yet another person (HSJProductions or Hardial).

JaredtheFox92 doesn't deserve to be on the streets.
Now he's claiming out of nowhere that I want to "dox" him. He's worse or just as bad as a dangerous conspiracy theorist nut. I wouldn't be surprised if he believes in that pizza conspiracy theory, whatever it's called.


In a nutshell involving me kinda, JaredtheFox92 has claimed that I wanted to kill people, claimed I wanted to dox him, that I thought Christians are nazies, said I advocated certain crimes, said that I wanted certain people to reoffend certain crimes, claimed that I am an otherkin that is a wolf f*cker, that I believe in weird magical specific stuff going to happen to this world I think, has claimed I "attacked" certain critics, has claimed that I accused JaredtheFox92 as someone who f*cks animals, and likely some other stuff against me. None those claims from him are true. This person shouldn't get a right to get away with those.

I'm hated by some people, but I'm mainly hated by these f*cked up people. Some hate me out of false believing too. Maybe I'm usually noticed due to how big of a mouth I have.


Section 2 | Starting Drama

Note: Might be combined with other specific stuff. Some might be in Section 1 of this.

JaredtheFox92 starting drama with a "vore" picture involving Donald Trump and some fictional dog character. After some conversation, JaredtheFox92 uploaded a screencap (gone now, maybe deleted by a DeviantArt staff) and acted like he's into bestiality.

First note this:

Not only with the empty and unproven claims (he's also "white-knighting" a couple of abusive people), but he's acting like he never went to my page out of no-where and started drama. Sadly the comment of him starting drama on a stamp having nothing to do with him likely is gone from public, so I can't show it. But I can show theses:




Note that there was nothing said to JaredtheFox92 for months. Then that happened.

JaredtheFox92 was denied roleplay assuming that's the case, then this person threw a typical fit and started harassing the person via public snapshot with messages like this. There might even be a big chance that this person is stating false statements toward the person, and I think this due to what may be obvious on this article...

Section 3 - Main Hypocrisy

His main hypocrisy involving this drama is that he thinks he's alright to spread wild assumptions based off unrelated context (e.g. accusing me as wanting to rape animals just because of a furry vore fantasy involving a four-legged anthropomorphic wolf). So a status was made to partly imitate his level of insanity just to make a point. And the same status was not actually serious about those four "quotes", and was trying to explain it. Those four messages being "quoted" was to also help express that it wasn't based off any real intention of spreading that as true.

Want to know how he responded?

He took it seriously, and accused me that those four things were "slanders", despite the clear context as to why the messages were said, and despite no known name was even being used there. 

In other words maybe, he thinks he can falsely accused people as being into immoral things based off no actual confirmation context, even when the context is so far off, but if someone does the same thing to him, he calls it "slander" or "slanders". Pathetic.

This is part of his main journal further exposing his hypocrisy.

Another thing I want to point out is that if I am thinking right, he even gave out less context false claims against me toward one (and maybe some more) person, yet he went crazy claiming that I "slandard" him because of a comment that part joked called hom a "zoophilia" without giving out the reason being of his "fox" furry character thing he has.

For anyone's information as to what the claim was toward that other person, it was the comment (that I already uploaded here) claiming that I wanted to rape animals.


Section 4 - Possible Victims

I'm already a victim of this lunatic, but there might be more.

Dog-lover22 was one I think. Note to him I will remove mentions of him here if he requests so or I decide too earlier.

TheLittledDemonCat

??? - https://www.deviantart.com/comments/4/8814768/3787835505

*****gaminggiantess - Partly censored for personal reason.

HSJProductions (Or Hardial)

Section 5 - He Can't Prove Anything Against "wwwarea" and Me

He's often said a lot of crap toward me, and never could prove it. He's the same person that thinks I "attacked" Dumbsville if I'm thinking correctly, yet there is no evidence that I went in and attacked him. I only made some disagreement involving some review points and some bad points toward me.

 

Section 6 - His Main DeviantArt Account

JaredtheFox92 - DeviantArt 

Section 7 - Special

The person is defending the message claiming that I am a "wolf ******" along with some other specific claims without evidence.
As one might recall, here was the message I called out:


Here is the person trying to defend it (I have a right to notice things like this):

Also note the other false claims, including the claim that I tried to "demonetize" two people.
Here is the rest of his mainly disgusting structure before the dog pictures he posted (which is also filled with personal attacking):

I've made a video of this journal too.

I have reported it. Not only this person thinks it's alright to defend false statements and says them, but this person even personally attacks me for preferring anthropomorphic wolf characters from an animated movie, including the bulls*** that it's "not" normal. This is coming from a person who likes anthropomorphic foxes based off real fox parts in some way. Note that the "wolves" I like don't even look like real-wolves either.

Let's face it Jared, you've gone off the deep end...

Picture found from here: https://youtu.be/JcdAlkfS9QI
 

Also, for some reason he keeps saying my first name wrong. Though he did this lot's of times before that journal. Anyway, the name is "Jesse", not "Jessie".  

_________________

This blog post might get updated.


Sunday, December 20, 2015

Exposing Channeleven Further

This is a copy and paste from Area's journal as he said he wanted to back it up, but still wanted the truth exposed somewhere, so I will take this request and put it out.

======================
The man (Channeleven) tried and attempt to find "my" Facebook again. After seeing an updated URL, I went onto Facebook and warned the person about this just now.


The fact that you (Peter) are so obsessed with finding personal information about people like that shows why you always been causing trouble (So I decided to do this back to you).

The fact that he won't leave me alone with his stalking, then I'm just going to move accounts much sooner than I planned to.

And yes, trying to find someone's Facebook (especially for a second time) and showing a link after doing that, IS stalking AND harassment.


And to viewers, THIS FOLKS, is why I can't stop talking about my stalker here.
Again, thanks a lot you horrible monster (Channel), thanks for showing that you still support actual stalking and obviously harassment. How do you like it if someone found all your personal crap that you try to hide REM and shown it on an article getting thousands of views? How would you like it if a certain someone uploads a picture of your house, and say bullshit crap like "Someone seeing a picture of this isn'tz stalkinz" as if the person who said that isn't stalking?
Yes, he said that to that Facebook link and hiding the fact that he's the one that advocated a link based off his stalking.


UPDATE:
The person replied: He said that he is very disgusted how this person tried to find his Facebook again, he may request Google to change the URL again and that he's very upset not only at this horrid stalker, but also to Google for failing to protect privacy settings to avoid people finding it.
--

I hope you go to jail for avoiding privacy protection, Peter.

Also, this isn't the first time I've talked about Facebook and Peter/Channeleven.
http://wwwarea.deviantart.com/journal/HOLY-F-K-UPDATE-UPDATE-563327601
======================== 
The only difference is that I had to replace this last part at the bottom due to the way it was linked. I replaced it with a normal link.

Also, in other news, I had another article request posted called "As far as I can go" and it had a picture of a random house, said to be 'by REM's house' but due to some second thoughts, I've decided to save it as draft for now.
I still have the image on here and I may share it with certain people.

Saturday, December 12, 2015

One Reason why 'wwwarea' won't let go of REM

 Of course, REM is the one that wouldn't let go of him in the first place.
Well after some research, I figured out that REM has yet, started another fight with 'wwwarea'. Seems he really has not let go of him in the end. Even though he said he would in a way at another area.

Requested:
===========================
Oh REM, why do you have to start fights with me again as you usually do? (E.g. How he starts journals against me for making journals not even directed at him)

So anyway, seeing this:
Proves further as to why Channeleven start fights.
For anyone's information, another person started a fight with me in this thread by claiming I was a "heterophoboa" and said other bad things.
Granted, I find 'common' heterosexual gross, but I do NOT discriminate them.
After explaining myself, and after some days, Channel (of course) came along and started posting more slandering and other bullshit about me once again.
Oh and by the way, here is a snapshot of the main thing that started a fight.

Name censored due to that possibly being a real person, but out of misunderstanding. But it was meant to be directed at me in attempt.




Why do people have to make the world more shitty?

Also, there was a recent post about me explaining something against non-sense and stupidity that Channeleven claims.
http://multiversefeeling.blogspot.com/2015/12/more-like-you-picked-fight-re-extreme.html

And as usual, you will still stalk me and continue to post shit about me maybe.
When will people like you learn?

=================
Request done
I wonder if REM is going to claim "stalking" over something that started fights with 'wwwarea'?

Sunday, December 6, 2015

More like 'you' Picked a Fight - RE: EXTREME Non-sense

Ah yes, the classic case of bigotry, and insane non-sense from that Channeleven guy, followed by some insane stupidity comments following along it too.

Request used:

===============================

Oh Channel, again with the non-sense and idiotic followers (At least some of them).

Found this here:
http://channeleven.deviantart.com/journal/I-tried-576402840
I haven't talked about wwwarea in ages, and now he decides to pick a fight with because I was trolling Sponge (that ROBLOX guy I talked about in past journals).
Picked a fight? Who's the guy who's been picking and starting fights with me about furry defending, spiritual beliefs, and so on?
And who's the guy who recently picked a fight and use "autism" as insulting names, and so on?
Me and Funnel have left wwwarea alone, yet he continues to obsess over the both of us.
Because of what you did before. You were the ones obsessed with me and starting fights with me (including others) in the first place.
I'm not going to say that it's "my fault", but in terms of 'focusing on users': Me, you, funnel, and some others are no different.
Since it no longer matters whether or not anyone leaves him alone, a response to the blog is possible.
Just like you with me, including with other people.
It'll be posted here, and it'll be posted on my blog in case he tries to report it, because we all know wwwarea is flag-happy.
And this justifies my claims about you with this 'possibility' you seem to put over me.

Oh, to wwwarea, I'll be waiting for you to stalk my page and respond to this.

The cringe is SO REAL.
You been stalking my blog, my profile, and possibly other places for weeks and months, and you even try to find my Facebook account.
Not only the cringe coming from you is so real, but you make people sheep and act like you're the "victim" after all the shit you did to me, my friend, and other people.
UPDATE: Still determining if I should respond. People claim he just wants attention, but even if I don't give it to him, he'll still whine. It won't matter what any of us do.
I feel like you are trying to act like me when I expose what you do.
How much stupidity and sadness does this world needs from you?

========================= 

Request done.

My goodness, that was the most stupidest non-sense I've ever seen.
To help further prove 'wwwarea's points:

Here:
http://wwwarea.deviantart.com/journal/HOLY-F-K-UPDATE-UPDATE-563327601
http://wwwarea.deviantart.com/journal/Why-I-Didn-t-Start-the-Drama-or-Dramas-564166964
http://multiversefeeling.blogspot.com/2015/08/remradioheadfan96-or-channeleven-history.html

There is many more where this came from!

It's beyond insanity for him to act like 'wwwarea' is going to stalk him and so, considering he (Channeleven) is the one that has been monitoring 'wwwarea' and me for weeks and months before!
Including the fact that Channeleven has always been picking fights with 'wwwarea''s for some of his stamps and journals.

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Oh Channeleven - Why do you have to Start Fights Again?


Request used:
===========================
Got some updates on that one guy who I question as to why he's even born?

Thanks to help, I've discovered REM has been harassing a user on Youtube because Channeleven/REM doesn't like this user and continue to post harassment comments to this poor guy.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNHB_emVNww


Of course, why did I say harassment? Found more comments from Channeleven:

 Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRaorV5ZEcE

Meanwhile, he also posted this:
 Considering Channeleven doesn't have any skill himself. Can't draw, model, or do anything so great.

Let's see if there is any more videos with Channeleven's obsessed comments about this guy?
.....

Said the guy who use 'autism' as an insult.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ5oadczunI

=-=-=-=-=
Well I don't know so much about the Youtube guy, but regardless, it's still sad and hilarious to see Channel's behavior in this form.
During the same time, he also posted a journal about it here on his Deviant"Art" profile:
http://channeleven.deviantart.com/journal/Thoughts-on-this-575622478

The History page has also been updated to expose more of his immature behavior. Not only pretty bad, but advocates legal hate speech too. (Discrimination based off disability).

Update!
I figured out the Youtube owner is just an ass like Channeleven is. Well I don't know about being the same exact.
Some bigot who has a problem with bronies and certain bronies for something not causing harm on another. He could have more hatred.
Regardless of the bigotry the Youtube guy has, Channeleven's behavior is still no different.

======
End of request.

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

What a sad Messed up User

 UPDATE: Removed the word "legit" down there. Might of used a label I probably didn't understand well. UPDATE DONE.

 

Well I got another request.. and I can't believe my eyes to see such an idiot act so selfish toward 'wwwarea'.

Request Used:

===============================

This user is really disgusting.. Not surprisingly though, it's an old user.
Here is the whiny journal: http://jaredthefox92.deviantart.com/journal/Here-We-Go-Again-574133499
Anyways Jesse replied to my criticism of his journal as expected. I contemplated not replying to said reply to my response to his journal, however I have to prove him dead wrong now.
"Because I said so."

Now beyond this, I'll add this note:
Within the quote spacing, the black text in this style (example) are his. Messages before it are most likely mine from earlier commentaries.
Like I said, I have stalkers, but I will respond to this one because of it's stereotypical promote and discrimination." (Not like you don't watch both Funnel and myself all the time, even in our comment sections Jesse. Also you're the one stereotyping us autists as 'gifted' or 'cool' without even knowing the trials that many of us go through on a daily basis. You think that we like being abnormal, misfits, and for the most part hindered from enjoying many things in life just because you find your own depression 'cool'? Who is the stereotyping individual now Jesse?  )
 Not like you do the same thing in the first place.
No I'm not. Then again, it could be ARGUED as one in a certain type of argument (as I already explained why).
Abnormal and misfits are just man-made terms.. And just because you don't feel comfortable because you feel "awkward" that doesn't mean it's a disease.
You are still the stereotyping because you claim that it's all a "bad" thing, etc.
And I wasn't saying suffering it's self is better, but I'm saying that being outside of a comfort zone can ALSO lead to better things, arguing that the thing we all have is simply a thing we have.
Perhaps it's not good or bad. It all depends.
"Don't know who 'Jesse' is but seriously? "Debunk"? Do you speak for all people then by forcing your own stereotypical thoughts over everyone else?" (Everyone knows your name now Jesse, heck Peter has even told me about your sister who used to be on DA. Also you already revealed that we know your facebook page so yeah, quite with the charade. I know more about Autism than you ever will Jesse. I've been around people who have more problems and issues with their lives than you ever will, people with cerebral palsy, dyslexia, littoral man-children who can't even comprehend washing their hands or locking the bathroom stall door. You know nothing of special needs Jesse, I've been around all types of autists on the spectrum and I know way more about the issue of autism and our problems than you ever could.)
No you didn't. I don't think I have a sister on DA. You could be mistaking a comment that said "brother" before when I do remember back then, we ha a fake family thing, where it's not actually a 'family'. I didn't say it was exactly my Facebook.

No you don't actually.
Did you know though, that their is TYPES of 'autism'? Did you ever think of that?
I know it plenty well..
I know that everyone autistic is different for each and every individual and I am also aware that the term 'autism' has been stereotyped to describe 'different' personalities as "autism" when it's not.

"That's to some people. Thanks for stereotyping that everyone is the same" (No Jesse, that is life. I've been around these people, many of them were my friends in middle school and high school. I've been around people who have it way worse than both you and I combined. It's not 'stereotyping' when I've been around these people for six years of my life. Also not once did I ever mention that 'everyone was the same', that is just some silly thing you made up in your mind.)
 You act like every 'autistic' is the same. When in reality, they are not.
First of all, everyone is normal for being different. Second, just because it bothers some, doesn't mean it bothers all.
You don't speak over everyone else who thanks their own "disorder".
(I never said they weren't, however your version of 'different' is basically them getting pity from others and not trying to strive to bring normality into their lives, you want people to be treated like Chris Chan instead of working for this sense of normality. My version is people  facing adversity and hardship stand firm in the face of their problems and try their best to make some sort of attempt to become as normal and functioning in society as they can. Take it from someone who had to do so in real life. The only people who 'thank' their disorder are those who have worked well enough to become productive members of society despite it. )
Again, you seem to dictate by sharing the illusion that their is a single "normal". When in reality, everyone is born to experience unique stuff. If you hate Chris JUST because he has a different personality, then you are a sad asshole yourself. I am not defending his actual mistakes, but that was another point..
Not everyone wants to be a "normal" functioning part of society.
Some people are introverts, some are asocials, etc. and it seems you force that those lives are "bad" and that they must be like other people, your an asshole.
I'm an asocial and a introvert, and it's quite possible that I could have a 'AS' but not noticed, and I do not want to be forced to be an annoying extrovert.

Also did you know that most of the suffering isn't caused by 'autism' sometimes? A lot of that is because of the discrimination of society (The lack of support) for those who are more different.
You don't own the term over everyone else, and it's very offensive of you to say that others with it who thinks different "don't count" and/or that they must "not speak up".(I never stated I owned the terms autism or aspergers, I know the later of the two was named after Dr.Hans Asperger. First off, you're the one who isn't counting the majority of people who have life even more difficult for themselves due to autism&aspergers. Second, I never in my life would say that anyone with autism 'don't count' or that they 'don't speak up'. That is simply rubbish for me as an legally diagnosed aspie to even contemplate with my fellow autists.)
No but you act like you do.
First of all, I am not saying those who suffer and is in need of help should not get help, if they want help, they can get help. But I CAN argue that you can't cure what's inside of your head.
Second, well you have a problem for those who treat it as a gift.
"You remind me of that website that sometimes censor other autistic people for speaking up about some stuff." (Right right, because me being an actual autist, as well as  myself being a proponent for helping autists make the best out of themselves is 'censorship'. Boy what a sad and strange little world you live in Jesse, and you don't have my pity. :iconbuzzlightyearplz:
 The way you talk sounds like you are saying that "autism is horrible, and a curse, we must cure it, etc".
That's what reminded me of that website too.
Do you have any idea how offensive that sounds to parents and etc. of autism?
There are a lot of parents who accept them for who they are, etc.
2. A spelling error doesn't make someone stupid.(True, but I must say you've already have done that to yourself.)
Keep telling yourself that.
"That still doesn't mean anything. Being more intelligent is still good for those who enjoy it, and everyone can get depressed off of something."(Only the true simple minded would ever believe that intelligence leads to more happiness. The more you know about the world the more you understand the danger, the uncertainty, and the cynical nature of it correct? That would explain a lot of your fantasies Jesse.) 
 "true simple minded". What the fucking hell does that mean? This reminds me of the whole "true fan" crap.
I already understand the danger, and while I understand it, that's why I am a huge fan of activist, change, etc.
"They are probably not depressed because they have it, but more about what they are thinking about.
When someone thinks and studies a lot, of course stress may came, and etc."
(Ha! HA! HA! Patrik and myself hardly think about our Autism when talking and we both are depressed as ever worried about issues in Europe, our different ideological stances, and theism  vs atheism all the time. I know Darkminster can be depressed all the time and he rarely even brings up his aspergers unless we get into a forced discussion about it.)
That's a personal reason. I have a lot of worries about certain subjects myself too, and I thank that because it will cause me to be more of an activist for certain change. If I suffer, I am suffering because of the fear and issues that goes on, due to future and uncertainty.
People having all this is a possible lead to being smart.
 "And stop speaking for every single person out there." (The irony and hypocrisy of this sentence is so thick I could use it to snuggle up with a blanket this winter.)
"Autism Asperger is a problem because I know only some people who has it that suffers". <Your basic message in a nutshell.
 Yet, it's ALSO possible that even the people who has it (I can include my self for other labels) couldn't understand why they have this, when it's possible to self-therapy why one is upset so much.
Remember, the label "mental illnesses" is not scientifically proven.
Sometimes I hear that 'autism is a disability' but HIGH functioning sounds like the opposite.
"To some people, it is more better, to some it's not. Stop saying "we aspies", I believe that's very offensive." (I'm sorry Jesse, when you are professionally diagnosed with aspergers via the recommendation of your school and parents then maybe you may have the privilege to tell me to stop referring to people facing the same issues I face on a daily basis.)
It's possible that a lot of people suffer now is because of the way they are treated due to the labeling.
Again, I say possible. A lot of the stuff could be based off many hidden reasons..
And also, when you say "we aspies" you are saying "we" as in every single person in the world who has it. A lot of people do not agree with you.
"Umm yes, again, you are stereotyping people and I find it extremely offensive of you to tell others who is 'diagnoses' to not stand up for themselves, etc." (Once more, I stand for people to stand up for themselves and make the best they can with the cards they're dealt :iconjimraynorplz: , also how I love it how the person without Autism is telling the person with autism that he's 'offending' autistics. )
Well, just because you have it, doesn't mean you speak for the rest of them.
It doesn't matter if I'm one or not. If you get to stand for others, so can anyone else.
"So for that, screw off." (You first mate. )
You started it by reacting to a journal that wasn't directly addressed to you.

"And I know what I'm doing, it's you that don't know. You seem to think that people who has what you have are all the same." (Oh really? :iconalucardplz: Tell me how you've spent six years dealing with people of the same issues you have, as well as with others who have issues that are far worse than yours. Such as being blind or not being able to move their entire body except their eyes and their mouths. I digress though, also I don't think that. In fact I know of many autists who have it far worse than myself and this fills me with nothing but sympathy for them. Well except one guy, but he was like you and a jackass for using his autism as way to get people to feel pity for him and basically not trying to instead strive to work as many others have in adapting and dealing with society. Guess who? :iconchrischanplz: )
I've been hearing about it somewhere in my life too. Yet, people can still research. A while back ago, I've found articles about it, and had an open mind with it, etc.
I know that major issues are found in 'low functioning' people, but far less with 'high functioning' people. I've seen people who were like that.
Did you know that 'High Functioning' was removed from that book? I think people may finally be treating those who are just high functioning as a "normal" part of life, but probably with more abilities due to 'HIGH' functioning..
"Again, that's just a term, man made theory. What is an "overload"?" (Here, you just proven you know little about aspies and autists, a overload, or a meltdown is when we autists get so much sensory input or negative emotions built up inside that we basically lose it. It's not a tantrum, once it happens there is no stopping it and it must run it's course. Sort of like a chain reaction in the brain if you will. However we need to be isolated and calm down and let it all out or we may become violent or even self-destructive. )
I know about meltdowns, but at the same time, I call it an anger issue. Super emotions can happen to other people without the label too.
When I you said 'overload', I thought you were referring to the brain getting so-called "too" much information..
Also, not every 'autistic' has this not fully explained problem.

Another problem is that a lot of people with anger issues were labeled one sadly.

"And not everyone wants to be that "normal"."(You've never been in a classroom with special ed kids before then Jesse. )
Are you talking about those kids in wheel chairs and those who has a lot of other issues?
You seem to suggest that all autistic people are the same again.

You want to know why I say that? Because I've seen more people with 'autism' than you.
Stop saying that people must be changed to be "normal", a lot of people take that as very offensive, and you really need to stop stereotyping them and acting like everyone must be changed for something they are born with.(Once more, sounds like you didn't even listen to what I've said. I want people to change themselves for the better, that isn't changing people, it is them taking the initiative to do so for their own sake.)

Cool, more links to something I've known all my life. :iconclapplz:
Sounds more like you. You think I think you support 'Autism Speaks' when all I said you reminded me of it.
And that's still kinda the same, plus the idea of 'better' is very subjective these days.

Since when is it better to force HF people to be Mid-F? Knowing that HF can have positive results (Very smart), I wouldn't want to get rid of that if I had it. Even if it can have risks (like anything).
Albert Einstein was HF, and if he was so-called "cured" or didn't have it, he wouldn't be like he was before.
"You don't speak over me." (On my page I do. :icondealwithitplz: )
And on my page, I speak over you then. I guess due to it being my page (or on this blog with permission), I can speak over your autism then.
"You have your own problems, and I have my own. Don't speak your bigoted mind over my own. You are the one treating your crap as "facts" over everyone else not you."(Yep, I do have my own problems, because I have autism, you don't, and what you say is only some rubbish you've regurgitated over the internet. Once more, actually live with Autism before you go running your fingers on the keyboard to speak about it Jesse.) 
You don't need to live with it in order to make a debate.
I already know the fact that a lot of people with 'autism' thanks it, and are happy with it due to the positive sides of the so-called "disorder".
Regardless if I am one or not, people can still study it, and understand the fact that maybe labels are bad, that we should just focus on that it's neither bad or good, but rather a tool. That some people could be born with it, etc.
"Also, people can argue that certain "disabilities" can be good even if it makes them suffer. BUT ONLY in terms like; "Sad can be an important tool even though some people can suffer, and some can't. It all depends."(Still they suffer, and I personally would say I would like to be normal and not suffer than suffer, as would just about any person with a disability I've met in the real world would say.)
Getting out of a comfort zone is also a form of suffering, but we need that kind of suffering IN ORDER to gain new ideas, ways, etc.
If we never had any form of non-comfort, then we wouldn't be here.
Have to remember that suffering it's self doesn't always mean "mental illness" but rather based off what you think.
And your last part? So every person who has a "disability" doesn't want it? I don't know about that...
"So before you think it's not the same as saying those people who DO suffer don't count, but this is more of a biological argument. " (Everyone suffers with a disability Jesse, some just suffer in different ways than others.)
People suffer without it. Plus do you know what a DISability means?
Is 'HIGHER' functioning a "lack" of ability?
Also, it can be argued that suffering isn't always based off "illness" but rather, something natural.
I suffer from certain things, but I believe it would be bad to get rid of the effects due to positive sides existing.

Which also makes me reason that the term 'mental illness' doesn't exist.
"Saying my own "label" is cool doesn't violate anyone's rights." (Never said it did, just that it's ignorant and you don't know anything about Autists. )
It's not ignorant if you had a "disability" and say it was cool. Because that person with it counts.
"Actually no, everyone is a "special" snowflake, being different IS NORMAL. Plus, saying they are not cool makes you a special snowflake if I had to agree with you."(Yes, everyone is 'special' in their differences, but what you want Jesse is pity and praise where it clearly isn't deserved. Also once more, being 'cool' is quire irrelevant when discussing serious life issues such as disabilities. You must think it's 'cool' going deaf, blind, or unable to move your own body properly. ) 
You saying it's "not" deserved is arguable and isn't a fact.
And if I had that, then yes I have a right to find it cool, but that doesn't mean anything bad.
If someone is born with an ability that has extra abilities for example, then it's fair to find it cool. Even if it was lack. That's not the same as morally arguing that they have more rights, but it is fair to say that 'more is cool' if the individual finds it cool in a personal thanks idea.

If I was born with the ability to fly, then yes I will find it cool because it's a legit thing I have and it's mine. Not yours.
If you say that's "special snowflake" as bad, then it justifies even more that the term "special snowflake" is just a stupid idiotic troll term.
Yet, you probably don't know what a 'special snowflake' really is.

People with extra abilities are not morally better, but people have a right to find having those cool.

Oh and just because it's considered a 'disability' doesn't mean it's not cool to EVERYONE who has it. Same with the other way around.
"You are the only one being egotistical."(Just look at my comment section and see what others think. :) )
Depending on popularity now?
"It's my personal life, and it's not yours. It's not "ego" to defend myself and speak my mind." (This went from your biased opinion on autists such as myself to basically you taking it personally, as usual. Where is your 'facts' about Autism now Jesse?:iconevillaughplz:
It's not biased. But yours is often.
All I did was argue and debate, like anyone.
Where are your facts?

And why did you ignore the links?
"The only egotistical thing that's happening are assholes like you."(Once more, I can use this irony and hypocrisy to make a nice snuggy blanket for me. It's so thick, perfect for making blankets. ) 
You saying a man-made term of disability is always bad when not every autistic agrees makes you an asshole.
"I didn't make ignorance nor bad choices despite a couple of legit mistakes. And again, you blame me for others choosing to do this to me." (Not sure if victim complex or just a really bad case of narcissism. :iconfryplz: )
Again with that word, just because you think it is, doesn't mean it is.
But you are promoting narcissism though.
And if you start making a journal against me, then I am a victim.
"Maybe it's because that crap isn't constructive criticism, but instead it's actually 'Brutal Honesty' as I heard from another user before." (Oh no, we can't have honesty now can we Jesse? That don't do at all now will it? I'm sorry, but aren't you one of those alternative media 'truth seekers'? Are you telling me you can't handle the truth no matter how brutally honest and inconvenient it is? )
Do you know what 'Brutal Honesty' means? And thanks for admitting that "honest" is the same as "criticism" when it's not.

You claiming your opinion is "truth" because you said so, doesn't make it truth.
Maybe you can't handle the truth from a lot of those sites, and one popular word is that they talk about people making people sheep, and you're a classic example.
"I block people for good reasons." (Yeah, anyone who doesn't say what is on your agenda or speaks out against you.)
Not true on everyone.
And speaking against me? Well that can be a good reason sometimes. No different than homophobia, heterophobia, fetishphobia/etc.
 That's different. That belongs in the line of "fans, murderers, robbers, internet users, gamers, seekers, etc." That's basic dictionary.
Oh and if 'humanaboo' is a stupid label, so is 'wolfaboo'
(Oh, it's different when only you think it is, but the rest of the internet doesn't? How fickle of you. I find them both stupid, but sadly for you wolfaboo exist on the internet and there is nothing you can do to change that. :icondealwithitplz: )
More like "It's the same because I think it is" <You
It's the same because it fits well with a fair describing thing.

And sadly for you, humanaboo exist on the internet and there is nothing you can do to change that.
Oh, and that whole bullshit of "you can't do anything about it". An average sheep who doesn't believe in change, when history proved it.
"Again, the overused word of "ego". The only egoistic person is you Jared." (Wow! This blanket is so thick it's like it is made of iron! I shall patent this, call it "The Iron Irony Blanket." Rolls off your tongue doesn't t? :D)

This is why you can't argue.
"That's my post. That person was acting very offensive, calls me "ego" for defending myself with depression, and other labels that I didn't even talk about."(Yet you are not even autistic, nor have you ever had actual experiences with actual autists. I was being very 'offensive' on giving you a real life enlightenment about what is truly means to have Autism. Calls you ego? You mean I called you egotistical Jesse? Also this journal you made wasn't about your depression, it was you trying to act like you know everything about autism when clearly you don't know a hill of beans about autism. :iconhankhillplz: )
You don't know my life about experiencing. Plus I say it's offensive because you don't speak over the rest of autistic and no, you do not need to be an autistic to say that. Also, it's "autistics", not "autists".
What the hell is a "true" autistic? It's like you are the one that doesn't know what it really is.
You make a journal acting like you know everything when you don't.

Clearly, you are no different, in fact, you seem more less open minded about autism than I do..
"Apparently this person supports stereotyping and censorship to those who speak their mind and defending. Who's the real egotistic?"(These Iron Irony blankets will sell like hotcakes this winter, pun intended! Though seriously Jesse, what do you think I'm doing hm? I'm telling you the full story about how us 'oppressed' autists truly feel. Once more, you don't have autism and I do. I know more about just by experience than you ever will.) 
And just because you have it, doesn't make your opinion anymore stronger than someone who doesn't have it.
And just because you have it, doesn't mean it's OK to speak to every single person who has a similar type.
"I can't believe this guy says that 'autism' is a "curse", a "disease", etc. I mean he acts like it is, and it reminds me of that horrid 'Autism Speaks' fear ad stuff."(Here we are,  first off I never will in my entire life ever condone Autism Speaks. They are a bunch of euginics nuts who don't even have any autists in their staff. Autism Speaks, but I ain't listening! Second, what I've clearly stated above is that I believe people need to work their hardest through adversity to overcome their issues and make somewhat of a normal life in society for themselves, at least to the best of their capabilities.)
Not everyone wants to be an extrovert. A lot of people accept their lives as the way they live. Plus, you can't ever make an introvert to an extrovert, they are born with it. So just like 'autism', you can't make their lives change all the time..
Yet, some 'autistic' could just be introvert, but a big example problem is that people has been stereotyping autism a lot.
"Anyway, everyone is different. Some people thank their "label" and some people don't like it. However, biological arguments can still apply and either way, to those who do suffer and don't like it, there is NOTHING wrong with trying to get help. But to say that it's "bad" it's self. That's speaking to everyone and yet, that could still be arguable in a biological way." (Most don't, true, there is nothing wrong with seeking help for issues. However one must also try to help themselves first, this is where you falter Jesse. You don't even try to change yourself for the better, you just want to go down like a sinking ship without trying to patch up the holes. You are just like Chris, using your disability as a mere card for pity and sympathy.This is coming from someone with the same disability you've been stating you know about, when clearly you don't.)
One must? Who said so? A god somewhere? Or the cult of society?
I don't need to change myself for the "better" because I am already better. Their is that 'narcissism' as you say that's only from you. You say I am "bad" because you said so when in reality, I never did anything wrong in general.

Actually no I'm not. If someone HAS a 'disability', they have a right to defend it as it is.
It's not the same as saying it's an excuse to be an ass.. even though I wasn't being an ass either.
And maybe YOU are using your 'disability' as a mere card then too.
BUT it is an excuse for certain things because certain 'disabilities' due lack certain things.
"Like for example again: I can suffer from a depression, but I can still argue that it can be OK to have it because depression can have the possibility to lead to better things. Know what I mean?"(Once more, you go off your intended topic to bring it all about yourself, way to use a strawman autism argument to further your own agenda. ) :iconclapsplz: 
Strawman?
Who's the one who says it's bad to treat suffering as good and who's the one who treat that "disorders" are always bad, no matter what those people who 'has them' thinks?

---------------

Another reason why these people lost.

By the way, here are the links the person possibly ignored:
aspergers101.com/aspergers-syn…
www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/wel…
www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/wel…

===========================

End of Request