This guy of course defends himself for his non-sense and other bigotry.
As I accepted the request, I will of course, post this insightful article!
===========================
http://channeleven.deviantart.com/journal/Commentary-Poor-Man-s-ED-568681576
Time to expose more of his garbage behavior and show why he's an insane brat who just can't learn that he's done so much wrong.
ALSO WARNING: He will twist up the meaning.
http://channeleven.deviantart.com/journal/Commentary-Poor-Man-s-ED-568681576
NOTE: The ones with the not bold words in the quote spacing is from that other article that was posted on this blog. The bold words in the quote spacing are Peter's
His "wonderful" history found here. Which also doesn't contain all his guilt either.
Wonderfully butthurt. Once someone has the common sense to get my side of the story, they'll see just how loony you really are.
Oh you mean those claims about me that aren't true. Showing stuff that isn't even wrong?
Even if I was a "goon", (I am not), you are still guilty.
Plus, using the term "butthurt" is no excuse that you are right.
Ohhhh, using my full name, that totally surprises me- Oh wait, I don't let pointless shit get to me.
I see. So apparently if you do not care, everyone else in the world must not care about their name that isn't yours.
is a highly delusional cyberbully
Save for that fictional term at the end of the sentence, it applies to you better.
Just because you don't believe it exist, doesn't mean it doesn't. Plus, I guess "wolfaboo" and "otherkin" are fictional terms. Same with "blackmail", etc.
Yet, to show your hypocrisy, you said it doesn't exist, but then it does all of a sudden on your last part of your sentence?
That's interesting.
(possibly in the real world too)
Uh, no. Even if I was, my online life is a shocking contrast to
my offline life. I'm actually a pretty nice person (albeit, a shy one),
I'm not much of a talker, but I get by. Also, at least I actually
go outside, as opposed to you spending your entire life on the computer.
According to what you do online, you are not a nice person.
Yet, once your RL friends see what you do online, they probably wouldn't like you anyway.
I go outside too.
Yet, you spend so much time online being obsessed with what you like, including crossing the line all for attention.
who often creates drama with people, start wars, and etc.
Hmmmm, reminds me of this 21 year old Texan who does the exact same thing. Can't put my finger on it...
No. My reactions are to stuff that already started it.
Example: Me bringing you out for making an open hate article does not start it. That would be you.
He stalks people, and the most of them all of which he stalks would be 'wwwarea'.
1. You do the same thing. But wait a minute, I know about the shit you crank out because my friends tell me about it.
2.
You are wwwarea. Why refer to yourself in third person? Oh that's
right, you pretend you're a different person on your blog (same on
YouTube). That's not even something worth lying about, and quite
frankly, it reflects on the reality that nobody supports you.
1. Umm no I don't. I am just on the look out to protect myself. I don't monitor activity every 24/7 to do any activity and post mock purposes and advocate harassment.
Your friends stalk me too actually. They monitor me, then give you notices about what I do. How the fuck does that sound like "not stalking"?
2. Actually this reply within the request is me, but two different people work on this blog.
Actually their is people that support me.
He has made an attack article toward 'wwwarea',
Attack? Nonsense.
It was merely a documentation of the drama you've caused, which
summarized why you're not a good person, and quite frankly, the way
you've cried over this only makes you less pitiable.
No it's not. It's an attack, stop twisting the meanings up.
You obviously post shitty opinions against the person, mock me, etc. That's called attacking. If it was a 'documentation', it would of been written by only saying what you see, without adding any fucking hatred at it.
YET, it could still be considered attacking depending on your purpose and reasoning.
And seeing the rest of your shitty quote shows why it's an attack article.
The things you pointed out are not morally wrong, you are just deciding that it's "not" good just because you said so.
Your bigotry is sad.
and has tried to find many of his profiles and such,
Again,
you have nothing to gain by pretending you're a different person on your
blog. As for your profiles, they're public. Anyone could find them. You
would have been better off not making the accounts at all if you
were going to cry about people finding them.
Already explained this.
Stop hiding the fact that you can choose to leave people alone.
to the point that he even attempts to find wwwarea's Facebook to publicly/harm post it on that horrible butthurt article.
"OH
NOES! FACEBOOK! ITS NOT LIKE I COULD PRIVATIZE KEY INFORMATION OR EVEN
CHANGE MY NAME ON THERE, OR BETTER YET, IT'S NOT LIKE FACEBOOK IS THE
MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE UNIVERSE!"
See folks? That's Peter who acts as usual as the bigot he is.
First of all, you are not other people. Facebook is easily a place where a lot of RL activities are..
Second, it still counts as stalking to try to link to it.
ALSO, you want to know what else is public? People's house addresses on 'certain sites'.
Are you saying it's OK to post it because it's on a public site? It's not private, they are all their, etc.
He obviously does NOT respect opinions.
Actually, I do. What I
don't respect is people expecting everyone to respect them. Why should I
respect an asshole who refuses to take criticism and learn from his
mistakes?
Sorry, but your trash isn't criticism. Your so called "criticism" that attacks others for your bigotry beliefs doesn't mean you are "respecting opinions" now. Yet, my stuff was criticism and you still claim I don't respect yours.
But if you want respect, you need to respect others in the first place.
THIS IS NOT FAIR CRITICISM.
Your History.
Yet, actual criticism is about pointing out faults, but what you bring out are not actually faults. You are just dictating that someone (for example) expressing their sexuality is "wrong" just because others find it "disturbing". Which by the way, doesn't give them a right to attack others when the fact remains that it's not being forced on them.
And considering, your sexuality (hell, pretty much everything) is considered disturbing to someone else.
Does that mean everything is public is now a "fault" now?
NO.
Just like the stuff you find a "problem".
Stop trying to disguise your bullying as "criticism", you already do what a bully does, and since that matches with examples and definitions, you do.
Face it Peter, you don't respect opinions. You do nothing but treat your personal opinion as a "fact" over others and claim that other people's likes and interests are a "problem" or "fault" or "both".
That's just now how it works Peter. You can't make up bullshit about people and just call it "criticism" because you want to.
That's the main problem with you.
He bashes people who likes to express fetishes.
Depends on the
fetish. If it's something that's disgusting and could cause a person to
do the wrong thing, I have a right to object to it.
No you don't. It's disgusting to you, but that doesn't give you the right to attack it.
I find your heterosexual stuff disgusting, but do you see me actually objecting it? No, because I don't disrespect personal opinions, like you do.
He treats his personal opinions as facts.
Don't you do that all the time with that movie where Romeo and Juliet become lycanthropes?
First of all, it's not exactly like Romeo and Juliet, especially since it's wolves, not whatever that was.
Second, I don't. I just disagree and argue what is fair and unfair.
Me saying the art style is a creative purpose isn't the same as saying "You suck for disliking it", or "my art style is better than yours".
There is a line you know and you just can't see it.
But here is an example of what counts as "personal opinion as fact"
Claiming the art-style is a "flaw" because you said so.
Claiming the movie "sucks" because you don't like the inspired story.
Claiming that something must be
this or
that (while ignoring the intentions of a work that ISN'T YOURS) is a "flaw" or "not".
Yet, you attack people who defend it as anthropomorphic movies and claim they are wrong, and dictate that you can decide over a work that's not your kind of style.
So who's the one who really treats their personal opinion as "fact"?
While he cyberbullies people, he doesn't even believe it exist.
Because
it doesn't exist. It's something that was cooked up by paranoid parents
and teachers. All that's there is people getting worked up over trolls.
Sounds like you got your info from that FOX News report.
Sorry buddy, but you do realize the same can be said for "wolfaboo", "bullying", "opinion", etc. right?
It exist, the effects are real, even the LAW said it does.
Sorry buddy, but it does exist and you have no right to dictate that it doesn't.
He advocates harassment to many people, including one where it was so
bad that it drove the poor guy to suicidal thoughts.. all because
Peter/REM didn't like something involving victimless fantasy.
Because
wanting to see children pee while naked is totally harmless, especially
if the guy jacks off to it and could influence him to commit a crime.
PaulandAmy anyone?
So requesting a
fictional character is somehow hurting real people?
Yet, thanks for trying to justified your horrid behavior.
Yet, making someone commit suicide is still cruel and just plain wrong. You are still guilty of it, even if that one guy did something "wrong".
Also, FEAR base beliefs does not give you the right to advocate harassment.
Being a heterosexual can be risky that it can have a risk of rape, like anything. I mean, it depends on how risky, but it's still fear base, like yours.
REAL FAIR CRIME involves who has been hurt. Not out of fear.
And of course, he will twist many things up and blame the wrong people.
Which
is a load of bull, and pales to you blaming everyone and everything but
yourself for your problems. Kinda reminds me of some comic book artist
and that other one who liked Sonic and Pokemon...
This is what I'm talking about people. Me standing up for myself is somehow a "problem" according to him and the fact that the real guilt is coming from those people who CHOOSE to do this crap to other people like me.
Sorry buddy, but you caused it.
Making attack journals, articles, etc. starts fights.
Me standing up against the things YOU start, doesn't make you a victim.
And neither does making those fucked up articles, stalking people, and some others. However, what you do does
create victims that isn't you though.
Like the time he claims 'wwwarea' is stalking him, but in reality, REM
monitors 'wwwarea' and constantly update his activity, and makes
journals based off more stalking.
Kinda like you.
Being concerned about stalking and making journals that defend the victim =/= same. It's called justice.
Victims have a right to stand up for themselves and show your behavior of what you cause first.
Again folks, what REM is doing is called 'Victim blaming', that's what a bully usually does.
Yet, according to the legal definition that I already quoted off the stalking journal, here is one of the examples:
False victimization. It is not uncommon for a cyberstalker to claim the victim is harassing him, taking the position of victim in his own mind.
And again, that's legally considered stalking.
All 'wwwarea' does is check his page a few times to see if any shit head is talking bad about 'wwwarea'.
Wanna know what that's called? Stalking.
You want to know what you do? (Monitor me, humiliate me, trying to keep up with my activity (monitor), making journals out of noticed against people making stuff that isn't aiming at you)
Stalking.
But what I do, isn't. Because I already gave out
this journal explaining why.
While Peter on the other hand, checks not only wwwarea's profile, but checks this blog, etc.
Again,
people tell me about the shit you pull, whereas you have no excuse
(seeing as you have little to no friends). You go out of your way to
stalk me and my friends because you can't take the fact that nobody buys
into your bullshit.
And you could of ignored it. It's still stalking, and you have to remember that your friends are stalking too (monitor, and giving you updates).
No, what I am doing, is justice. I (as a victim) has a right to be concerned about bullshit that involves me, thus making is my buisness.
Plus, I'm not the one who checks you for cyberbullying purposes.
I don't attack you for expressing sonic, for your religion, for your sexuality style, etc.
I already gave out so much history of his mistakes.
TRANSLATION: I've whine about REM so much that he has become a part of my life.
Actually, that's kinda true. Because you actually did effect my life in some ways.
You won't leave me alone, you force your shitty opinions with people around me as "fact", you call me a "wolfaboo" and other personal insults over people for harmless expressions, etc.
You also caused people to harass me too.
- He attacks consenting things involving some furries (I.e.
Fetishes, fursuits in public, private consenting relationships with it,
and maybe more.).
Fetishes could affect humans more than you
think, fur suits represents ones detachment from reality (they pretend
they are who they dress up as), and private stuff is still an issue.
They could be doing illegal shit in secret.
In other words,I attack certain furries.
My original quote still stands.
He is trying to justify his non-respecting opinion out of 'Fear', 'Personal opinion about reality', and 'Deciding that privacy rights isn't a right'.
Again, my quote still stands (like the rest of them).
- He has attempted to send a link to a comment having an illegal link to a an illegal pornography site*
Even though I made it clear that the guy was the one who posted the comment in the first place.
Umm yeah I know. The quote said 'to a comment having an illegal link'.
Still doesn't change the fact that YOU posted a link to the comment linked with an illegal site.
If you are talking about a comment linking to yet another comment linking to another site.
Then what about that journal you made BEFORE you updated it?
Yet, I wonder about you just leaving that guy's comment up?
- Makes bigoted hate videos involving fetishes he doesn't like
So
taking a quick glimpse at ones gallery (even those that display that
the artists might serve as potential threats) is a bad thing?
Your
purposes of the video is the problem.
You post it and act like it's a problem and posted it for humiliation and mock purposes.
That's an example of a hate video.
"Which especially puckers my lips because he criticized me!"
Of course the guy admits it, with the delusion that all his crap is "criticism" which makes the bigot thinks he didn't do any cyberbullying then.
And gee Peter, I thought the site was just a joke?
But to see you admit that the article is serious, it doesn't belong there. Oh and since all the stuff you bring out isn't flaws.
Of course, just because you think it is, doesn't mean it is.
- Openly express hate journals to individuals
Don't you mean providing evidence on why they're bad people?
So furries who wear fursuits, who likes fetishes and express them, who has CONSENTING sex in private, who likes farts (without hurting people), who disagrees with you, give out opinions about companies, etc. are "bad" people?
Oh wait, let me guess, your fears tells you that they will do bad. Which by the way, is untrue or unknown and I also will say that:
When you drive a car, you will probably hit someone.
Or you may rape someone with your sexuality.
etc.
Don't you?
Nope.
- Attacked Alpha and Omega fans
Remember kids, criticizing fans of a mediocre movie is the same as spitting on the flag.
This isn't criticism:
"Fans are just autistic wolfaboos" "All A&O fans attack people who don't like art style" "Bitching about fans who likes to express them" "Pretending your personal opinion is "fact"" "Posting a 'Are you fucking kidding me' meme to a fan group", etc.
Yet, your claim that the movie is "bad" is just an opinion and it's ... wrong. < I wonder if I am now a "bad" person for disagreeing with you off a claim that is beyond your own head? Just curious.
- Posts hate content directed at people for cyberbullying purposes (E.g. Mock, Humilate, etc)
It's already clear that you can't take criticism, so I'm not surprised with this.
Again, a guy will call all his cyberbullying "criticism".
Face it, you have to realize that not everything you do is "criticism" and even if it "was", it's immature cyberbullying "criticism". Because words can sometimes be connected.
Just like how 'trolls' can sometimes be a type of cyberbullying form.
Can't be any worse than you whining that people have functioning brains.
They don't have functioning brains. I mean you know what I mean.
Yet, actually I have a right to "whine" about people who say crap about me, and yet, Slander IS bad.
The quote wasn't directly addressed by him.
- Violated the DA rules many times
You'd only care about that because the time you got me suspended
So basically REM admits that one, but to his claim, that's not true.
I also say that to your cyberbullying friends who also violated it the rules and they didn't even get suspended (At least to the recent people I was dealing with).
- Bullies people for their spiritual beliefs
TRANSLATION: "He criticized my delusional beliefs because I treated them as if they were all true!"
Actually, you are the one that does that because you completely call them "delusional" just because you want to.
In reality, a belief is usually about *ahem* believing something could be true or is.
That's the point of a belief.
You on the other hand completely attacks them like you just did now.
Do you see me calling your religion "delusional", or whatever you have?
No.
But you on the other hand attacks people for being open about their own personal spirituality and of course, disguise your garbage as "criticism" as an excuse to keep doing that.
- Treats his personal opinion as "fact"
Don't you do the same thing with Alpha and Omega?
So you hide what you did with that movie and of course, with many other people not you, and blame someone who actually
doesn't do that? Really, do I?
Something you do for sympathy.
Assumptions =/= Fact.
Better than wishing that they'd die of a heart attack or burn in hell.
Thanks for admitting it.
Yet, despite that the past is the past and that I don't do that anymore, it doesn't sound like a 'personal insult' as it's not name calling.
- Hypocritical content - Example: He claims he respects opinions, but judging by what he does a lot, that is not the case.
I
have a gut feeling he's referring to Alpha and Omega again. If not, I
provide my own arguments why I like or don't like something, and I don't
have to respect everyone (referring to those who act disrespectful in
the first place)
First, you just made one even now with the 'Cyberbullying doesn't exist' but then say I "cyberbully" you.
Second: It's referring to not just that.
And thanks for admitting that you don't respect opinions. - Yet, considering, you are the ones that do that first.
Yet, the way you state why you don't like something is completely wrong.
Because getting it off to wolves, farting and constant whiners means you're a victim.
No. Attacking people who does harmless stuff, makes who you attack a victim.
Thanks for admitting it.
Plus, "whining" about horrible people like you doesn't mean they are not a victim.
Referring to yourself again?
Avoiding the subject, and of course blames the wrong person.
- Has agreed at least once that he will find out where 'wwwarea' lives
Well
let's see, you revealed your first name on your Twitter (why else would
you change it?), your full name on your Photobucket and your state and
town on your Fanpop account. Connection? You revealed these yourself,
yet you refuse to admit that people knowing about these was your own
doing?
You have to know that agreeing to finding out where someone lives then trying to gather information from public is kinda like doxxing right? That's different than simply seeing personal information in the public it's self.
Plus when I looked at that archive you posted for my account, I did not see it.
Yet, not only that name was probably fake, but the
way you are trying o find that information is the problem.
Trying to find out where people live, is the same as trying to track people down, and that's different than just 'seeing' the city.
The way of how I did to yours, was no different.
You posted your name, you posted your city, etc.
So in other words, you still started it.
The only way you
could've known about that is through stalking, and yes, I'll admit that
I'm not all for three more A&O movies, because they've gotten worse
since the second movie. Why continue beating a dead horse when it'll not
bring about good results?
I accidentally found it on that attempt of finding links.. without monitoring it. Yet, right back at you since you do monitor activity of mine.
Yet, you do realize that I may still go to that group and possibly find that comment. Which can be likely to be an accident.
Also, I think some of the sequels did better than the second sequel, so of course I will defend them because you are wrong about them. (I say that (I think) because you wonder why I defend something YOU think is "worse".)
- Has possibly been arrested in RL **
Spoiler, no I haven't.
I wish I could explain why I thought, but it may be considered releasing restricted information. So I won't.
* I did not click on the link he sent, but I heard someone
commented saying that someone uploaded a link to a CP site, and the guy
sent a comment. Then Peter made a journal about it? Though I heard he
updated it to change the URL?
He also said you need an
illegal program to access the illegal site (DO NOT EVER DO THIS PEOPLE),
and I'm curious how he knew that?
It's called research.
Yeah.... right.
** I remember trying to search his name on an arrest record
site, and I think I found a match. However, I did not go deeper from the
results much. Also, consider this a guess, not something I know.
I'm not the only Peter Vecchio in this world, you know. Also, you think that I was involved in a crime? How mature.
Right... (I can't explain how further)
How is thinking someone could be involved in a crime "immature"?
It's really bad. And the worst part is (I think) that he actually
has friends (who has similar behavior) who thinks he's not doing
anything wrong.
My friends are different, similar to
how I don't let my online life influence my offline life. You wouldn't
know because you never leave your room.
Umm poeple are allowed to take ideas from the Internet and have it be inspired for RL. It's no different than reading a book, watching a movie, etc.
No different than reading the news. The Internet is just a communication tool.
And I left my room before.
In fact, the issue I'm having with this suffering crap is also found in RL. Which shouldn't be surprising because the people online are based off RL too.
The main reason why I made this was because not only I am a victim, but...
"My ass has been penetrated far too many times!"
You really should look in a mirror buddy.
Just shows why you are pathetic.
HE WON'T LEAVE ME ALONE.Even if I try to ignore him for what he's done to me.
Why
is that? Because you refuse to listen and realize why people go
after you and because you blame everyone but yourself for everything.
Of course I do, I refuse to listen shitty hate that does nothing but promote control, bigotry, stupidity, and other bad things.
You always blame the victim so people who CHOOSE to do that to me can continue.
I blame you, and your friends because you have the CHOICE to let go of someone and move on, but you don't and continue to blame the victim for being concerned about this major problem.
What this monster does will attract negative results, and that will be so.
If my results are negative, then yours will be catastrophic.
Oh get over it. If you are negative to people, expect negativity back, no matter how negative it is.
He doesn't deserve respect from his victims. And as a victim, he will never get any respect from me.
I don't care if you don't respect me. You're too lost in your delusional world to learn from your errors.
What "delusional" world? Though I see your world, and it's
very delusional.
Your claims that I'm "delusional" are all biased, not proven, etc.
"ZOINKS! He found my Facebook! Time to whine like a bitch!"
In all seriousness, I don't care if you know my Facebook.
So basically someone not you being concerned about their personal life shouldn't "whine" about it?
His Youtube
Don't forget to subscribe for logo combos and playthroughs of flash games.
His Flickr
More of a photo archive than anything else.
His Wattpad
I
haven't had any time to write any stories, and even when I have the
time to write more, it won't be on there. There is one chapter of a book
that I'll post on here though: www.wattpad.com/151121999-bloo…
His Twitch
Once I get enough time, I'll do a silent stream of Abobo's Big Adventure.
Do you need to react to every small link I sent with pointless stuff lke "best game site" "I don't use it anymore", etc?
Also, it's just there regardless of your history, even if you don't use it anymore.
Sadly, I cannot find that possible other photograph site. Where I found that other person. Not sure why I didn't save it though.
He's
referring to Instagram, and the person he's referring to is my sister.
Since he went to the trouble of finding my sister, I'll point this out
now. wwwarea has a sister.
Nice try, but I
didn't know it was your sister.
Jesus, I wonder what makes you think I do? I wonder how much stalking and deeper information you have to go through to attempt to find more information? Of course, sure I went to his public stuff, but I'm not the first.
Also, I guess it turns out I found that account, but it was deleted...?
Not to attack the person, but just to make REM feel how I feel when
he fucking tries to find my every activity online AND offline (i.e.
Facebook)
I don't give a shit, and I doubt she would either.
Of course you don't.
Just for anyone's information, I don't actually 'stalk' these. The
reason why I have all this now is just that I tried to look for the
profiles just when I was writing this article. But I don't do this every fucking day for bullying purposes. <From other article, had to put this one up because that part of the message was also bold.
I thought you were talking about yourself. You were referring to me simply finding your profiles by complete random.
Searching 'wwwarea' on Google, and even linking that Fan Fiction account, trying to find my steam, etc. isn't 'complete random'.
Yet of course, you attempted to post all those links when you had the choice not to.
So you deserve it when I did so back.
To also let you guys know, Peter/REM is the one that started doing
similar stuff to me, accept it was actually for cyberbullying purpose.
Keep telling yourself that.
Well it's true. xD
Good news though. The blog REM history here is FINALLY showing up on Google Results. Now it will be easily found more.
I thank for the possible help!
Yes, now everyone could witness your failure.
Not really a failure, better people will be able to find it, etc.
Yet, there is a lot of DA users that I don't think would accept your behavior. That includes your victims other than me.
What have we learned ladies 'n gentlemen? wwwarea is never at fault for the shit he causes, no, it's everyone else.
The only thing to learn (again) was that I was right about you.
As a little treat, let's go over wwwarea latest instance of faggotry.
More personal insults huh?
Real mature.
WANING!
Yeah, my hope for you is waning.
One error I made, you make big deal out of it.
Real mature.
This is a link to an article that may suggest 'End Times'.
If you are offended by this, I would suggest to avoid it, thank you!
"Don't you go giving me criticism! I take it worse than Spoony, Phil Fish and Jfreedan combined!"
Oh. So this is about that one journal I made.
See folks? This is what I'm talking about when REM always starts fights with me.
You do realize you don't even know what "criticism" is. And you calling me a "loony" for believing this just because you disagree makes you a loony.
Maybe you are the worst of all cyberbullies online.
That's right. wwwarea believes in aliens. It's fine to believe in
aliens, but believing that they've traveled to Earth? I don't think so.
"I will dictate that it's not OK to have your own belief system because I said so!"
This is why you are a bigot Peter.
You always think you know everything but you don't.
Sorry buddy, but you don't know everything about history, plus their is evidence, etc.
And look at you, trying to expose someone for a belief he has a right to, to mock and humiliate. Yes, that's an example of cyberbullying, which by the way, exists.
I do think aliens did visited us before. Though it's been challenged,
but it's kinda idiotic to think that aliens never visited us because we
don't know our own history fully, and of course, the UFO evidence.
But it's not idiotic to believe they came to Earth?
How is it idiotic?
What if it's true? "Nobody" knows but that doesn't make it idiotic to wonder and guess if it's true or not. It's not idiotic to believe out of faith or whatever it's called that it happened.
Yet, their is a lot of good questions from history that helps proves it.
Sure some people claim it's "wrong", but they don't 100% know that either.
Yet, when I say 'idiotic' I was referring to the theory that aliens existed before we did (Because planets do NOT form all at once) and due to UFOs and that fact, it would be odd if not one time, they found are planet.
I could totally give out a shit ton of proof, etc. But I don't feel like it right now.
And nope, popular belief is not a fact. It's sad how 'big media' acts
like an asshole to people who are open to theories. What the do promotes
censorship and hurts curiosity honestly.
People bash certain theories because they tend to be ludicrous beyond belief.
And them bashing it doesn't mean they are right.
They have a right to challenge a theory, but it's idiotic to treat a theory against it as "concrete" and then idiotically call people "delusional" just because of what someone thinks so far.
Anyway, as a truth seeker, I heard this guy talks about an E.T. Agenda and talks about that 'Solar Killshot' stuff.
I doubt that he'd be a good source for information.
..Moving on as I already explained why.
Heh, one of the strong reasons why I find this guy very interesting was
because the same guy did predicted the Japan Earthquake before.. Even
talked about reactors before it too.
"I like him because his brain has as many holes as mine!"
So if something is predicted (Especially very specific) and it comes true, it's "stupid" now?
I believe a normal person can openly take that as something interesting.
Yet, I don't have any holes in my intelligence, though, you do.
Yet, where is your proof that he's "wrong"?
Some say the world will end, some say some alien movement will happen.
Hmm the alien movement sounds way better than the world ending doesn't
it? Haha
No, not really.
Aliens picking people up and moving them on a safe planet is just as bad as a world ending with the humans and other animals on it?
And that's wwwarea ladies and gentlemen. Remember, no matter how bad you suck, you're still a hell of a lot better than wwwarea.
I never sucked.
But you did.
-------------------------
End of Request
Ladies and gentlemen, that's REMRadioheadfan96/Channeleven/Peter.
He always stalks people, start fight with people, etc.
And see see more, he even started a fight with 'wwwarea' for making yet, another journal that DIDN'T mentioned him.
