Flayrah - Main Message

This is from Diamond Man. I am here mainly to say goodbye to this account, and I plan to open a fresh new one without any real public connection to this. It's clear that when it comes to sensitive topics, some of the community is extremely toxic about it: Many have no full acceptance to psychology, science, nor any other type of realistic view about specific topics (usually certain sensitive topics such as the 'sex offender registry'). Wilful ignorance is preferred by some, many likes to insult, some depends on this one fallacy, some defends furcons banning changed people just because of their past (a form of discrimination morally speaking), and apparently some cases of identity theft is acceptable there.

I am hated for no valid justified reason, and it's looks likely that some even use the "karma" star rating system against me because it's me. This is partly why it's justified for me to hide and not connect to this account when commenting. Ironically some of my "Anon" comment got fairly rated and if many people knew they were me, they probably would of down-voted it more. Glad I went that way. Anyway I might of talked some of this later in this blog article.

_______

I have already made a blog post about how awful the main community is there, and I likely don't seem to regret one bit about it since it's on point. Though I don't know why I bothered calling it a "review" as the title should just of been "Flayrah Is an Awful Furry Site".

I have had my experience with it a lot, and while I can't say I'm perfect, it's very clear that such community generally speaking* is just flat out horrible. Even the very owner of the website went into one of these journals and posted this: "Shipping isn't right, it's a privilege - and it's just been revoked. 🐇"-Italics added. - Though, it's possible the person was mainly just making a friendly joke without sharing an ounce of seriousness in such message, including without hatred to the person with the bunny thing. But I just don't really see it. If GreenReaper wants to message me this, I will update this when I can.

Some of my non-perfect stuff was me being what may have been overly defensive of an animated movie series known as "Alpha and Omega", and the biggest regret I've actually had was that weird commentary thing I posted involving someone called "Fred", and frankly I have my regrets for that the most probably. So assuming right, I do apologize for being overly sensitive about a few things. Please note that I still have some of my main views about that wolf movie.

*Not literally every single person there.

__________

Examples of the most toxic moments I've had was that I was attacked for expressing realistic views about how certain criminals should be treated and because of me merely disagreeing with some points about some animated movie. I was attacked for making clear about me not defending possession of real-world CP, but suggested that people who merely saw it should never be blamed for the choices of those who has made more, and that punishment should in fact vary on why. I was attacked for believing in accepting those who's changed, attacked for some some disagreements involving an animated movie (likely Alpha and Omega related), I was attacked for being more realistic about who is who involving certain criminals, and I was attacked for providing actual study on criminal complicit theory. Please note, I'm not the only one attacked for some of these views (if I'm assuming right).

I am against perversion of justice, and strongly believe that it's morally wrong to blame those for the choices of other people as equals unless such person is described by law as being responsible, and I am strongly against ruining anyone's lives for any bad choice (or "mistake") they have made in the past. From some of those people's behaviors, such behavior is likely a complicit to the reoffending rate, vigilante justice, and the suicidal rate increasing involving those criminals. Those people are likely JUST AS BAD as those that have made real-world CP, if not worse. I also believe that isolating changed people from any lawful area is also a complicit into the reoffending rate. It doesn't matter if a "furcon" is a "single" place. It's part of society, thus it's still isolating further away from society. Facts like that don't change.

Society has a responsibility, and it's already proven that society's treatment toward specific people effects those choices. There are many sources (that these furry Twitter freaks hate) showing this.

Usually the most perverted and toxic type of people I've experienced there was: 2cross2affliction, Equivamp, and a few other people. They are usually a stain of the type of society that is part of today's problems with specific individuals. I have already shown some awful examples coming from at least two of these members here, and I still don't fully regret showing them.

The least toxic people, and the more rational people (who are hated more on Flayrah, which is not surprising) are likely Rakuen Growlithe** even though I'm not very happy with that person either. However that person is probably the only person where I can put our silly Alpha and Omega drama aside if that person actually has a similar belief I have involving criminals, but I won't expect it.

**I could very much be wrong on Rakuen Growlithe.

_______

Anyway, the reason why I am wanting to make a new account without any concrete evidence to the "Diamond Man" account is because it appears that some degenerates (usually involving already mentioned members and some anonymous people) really like to create drama with that. Also the rating "karma" system is usually abused (usually rated down out of hatred). Granted, this idea I have might be "deceiving", but I think it depends how it's used, and I think it's justified because of this situation. Maybe I'll also rate some of my old comments 5 stars to fight against censorship and I know that might sound a bit hypocritical with the "abused" comment, but I don't care at this point.

The only thing that remains so special about this website is that having certain controversial opinions alone is not entirely removed, even though it can be close to that whenever a comment is rated extremely low by it being hidden, faded, and requires a click. It's still censorship, but due to it not being entirely removed, that's what justifies the "special" point the website likely remains having.

On another thought, it's also possible I won't even bother with the new account a lot.

If GreenReaper wants to message me about the "new account" thing, or any other concern, feel free to message me on the email attached to the "Diamond Man" account, or through the direct messaging through it on Flayrah itself. I would recommend Flayrah because I don't check that email address a lot.

This article might get updated.

===============

flayrah

where rationality fades away