Tuesday, April 29, 2014

The Most Violated Rule of The World

The Golden Rule

Many people never treats them self Equality. All they do is selfishly attack others for what they like to express, eat, and even possibly, live.

In this world, we have unequally of the following:

  1. Race
  2. Species
  3. Sexuality - Including the types of sexuality that may be consider "Fetish" or "Paraphilia".
  4. Sexual Freedom - Including the types of sexuality that may be consider "Fetish" or "Paraphilia".
  5. Freedom of Expression
  6. Eating
  7. Drinking
  8. More
Sadly this world has had a thing for hate. One of the most common triggers for it may be "fear".
However, lot's of people are just plain selfish, they just decide to have hatred for there selfish believes of how they enjoy thinking about others I.E. Making fun of them based off there personal dislike.

I don't know for sure, but I assume people just had a fear about different races such as color for example. But it's very sad to see people think that a skin color or any other race form is somehow "better" than another. It's bad, and very selfish. The good news is that "Racism" is no longer accepted, however, people seem to misread on what racism is and isn't. Which may be another problem.

These are one of the things I hate very much. There are a lot of humans who think they are "better" than one another animal. They think that hunting is "OK" just because they think the Humans are "better" when there not. They sadly think that other animals have no rights, which isn't the case. This is called Speciesism. And it's bad, and needs to end. All animals are Equel, no matter. Tip goes like: If other animals has no rights, then Humans don't and we should hunt humans then.
The sad thing about this is that, this is still common maybe. And this is one of the strong reasons on why I am mostly an misanthrope.

Sexuality and Sexual Freedom
One of the biggest problems is the "man-made" labels. We have corrupted morons who does not treat other's sexuality as equal as them.
For labels, I have a feeling that any other sexuality that is consider a "fetish", must be censored. They may treat that a "fetish" is more extreme than kissing. And I find that offensive.
It's true that there can possibly be actual extreme things within a "fetish" or "paraphilia" but the problem that some people probably claim is that a "feitsh" or "paraphilia" is consider extreme it's self. When for the case of lives, it shouldn't.
For that case, people are selfishly saying that people who posts "Kissing pictures" are OK, and doesn't past the censor line, but a simple, let's say "foot" picture in a sexy way, goes "past" it. They unfairly treat a simple picture like that as extreme as an X rated, picture, just because it's different.
That needs to stop.
We also have issues like homosexuality, bisexual, etc. The hatred against those are also bad, and needs to end now. Why can't sexuality it's self be an open thing like any other thing? It needs to be, and should be.

Freedom of Expression
This is sort of similar to the "Sexual Freedom" case, but this is more about anything.
We have "haters" judging others for expressing something different. Like if someone expresses a character they love, they get bashed just because the other guy hates it. That action is offensive, the bully who attacked him, gets to express his own interest but the other one can't. The person failed to treat others the same way as he treats his own self. See what we are getting here with all these examples?

A good example is when someone is forced to eat another gen of food or other negatives about the other person's personal like or dislike.
Example: This person is a Sea food hater, and he rather likes Italian food instead and the other person is a Sea food lover. Now at this point, it does not violate the Golden Rule, but then when the Sea food lover asks: "Do you like Sea food?", and the other guy said: "No, I personality hate Sea food", the Sea food lover gets pissed off, and forces him to eats it, or says his food is weird but mine isn't. That is when the Golden Rule gets violated because the person failed to treat the person's personal interest as equal as him.

I could say it's the same thing about Eating, but with different kinds of drinks or something. So you probably understand what I'm referring on this part. However, I could use another example. Telling others how to drink there drink is also pretty selfish, like telling others to drink like them violates the Golden Rule.

And those are just examples. I'm sure there is more, but I tried to bring out some large examples.
If we lived in a perfect world, the Golden Rule would of often been followed, and pretty much all people would be for toleration. Everyone would express what they like, and every different expression of anything would be treated Equel.
That my friends, is the world I always wanted.

And I will say, if this world fails to get to that point, then the possible End Times may fix that. I could die, go to an After Life, and end up on that (What could be consider "forbidden" by this society) world.

I have hear that something may happen soon, and it could be mainly about the Golden Rule.
Let people stand up for there personal self, and help fix such a corrupt planet, for a better, and peaceful world.
By now, I will look forward to travel to other worlds, even if this world was fixed someday.


CC - 3.0 Attribution only
Link is required according to the info from the Creative Commons website

A Good Example of a Cyberbully

Another possible small blog post. OK, maybe it's not small.

Tuxxy from Equestria Gaming is the worst.
When people challenge him, He will try to humiliate Him/Her in front of some random people on Twitter, based on what He thinks. Following by idiots to laugh on his side.
That my friends is what a bully likes to do.

He attacks hard working projects based off his biased feelings; attacking a purpose (Like meant to feel like Super Mario World for example) just because he hates how similar the purpose looks (Edit: I will say I don't know if that is the main reason though. Edit done). Also, when someone questions him, he will be pissed and possibly again, post it on Twitter. Note: Can also post misleading crap based off it on his own articles.

He will take private messages outside as I heard. So don't tell them your own secrets, problems, or other personal info. If he thinks it's bad, he will probably post it once again, on Twitter, or other places.

Thinks his biased criticism "can't" be argued.

And lie even more. The same guy tried to defend one of his lies as well on one of my blogs.

Also, got upset on why I reviewed his site as an awful dangerous place.

It's just another proud reason on why I left this partly horrible Fandom.

A true, and open minded person would never do what He did. Unless maybe he is doing so to protect Him/Her self, or for other people. Like what I'm trying to do. It's a reaction against real problems, such as painful effects. And he just continues to defend that. If he defends something that hurts others, then I see nothing wrong with warning people about this.

I really don't want to abuse my own will for what I could do to this website... legally. But if this pain continues to happen, I might do it... It could work you know. It could.....

Edit: Here is one of the reports about Tuxxy from "Joel Leclerc" from this area:
"On a sidenote, he actually successfully managed to destroy my reputation by sharing specific private chat lines (out of context) to the public, plus he twisted my words, lied about me, etc.."

Yep. Let the truth be revealed. And I now believe this person more because Tuxxy (The same guy) did something similar to me. Edit done

Edit again: Tuxxy claim that I "trollbait" on that one comment I made on his website. That is ridiculous, He needs to understand what trolling actually is. Oh, I tried to explain that to him, but He just ignorantly deletes my comments, so he can continue to lie once more.
Edit done

Now people, avoid people like him, and embrace what you love for others to enjoy, and ignore false criticism that attacks your own expression for what it is.


CC - 3.0 Attribution only
Link is required according to the info from the Creative Commons website

Real Proper Critique

Little blog post once more!

What is wrong with this picture here?
I think this game sucks because it has the color blue in it. 1/10 Creepy...

Does this sound like a real good "critic"?

What is right with this picture here?
I think this game needs some work for it's purpose, the person isn't very blue like what the person purposely tried to do.

That my friends, is how you follow proper Critique, otherwise if you are more for biased reviewing like the top example, your post should be consider hatred. Like any other hate message.

Yet, even if there was so many problems that lacks stuff for what it is, that doesn't mean you should tell others it "sucks" or to "avoid it". The viewer is the viewer. I don't think a matured reviewer uses trash names like "Sucks" anyway.

Also, if critique is about biased, then there needs to be a better official definition and such.
But I suggest to review in a honest and respectful way, and be less biased. Not an ass-hole.

Creative Commons - Abuse

 Edit: CC: 3.0 - If talked about, please fully credit, including a link to the original article which is this.
Also, according to the picture below, it's valid to say you must link to the original article when you use it. Edit done.
Plagiarism is when you lie about someone's post, possibly without giving the source too.

Good Crediting - Fully linking to the whole source, and not make up stuff from the article including cherry picking and making up stuff from it.
Bad Crediting - Only saying my name, but failure of matching info; Lying about what an article, work, etc.

Lying and/or pretending you made it when that's not the case can be a huge problem. It's generally identity theft. Copy without permission, and lye about it. It's OK to Copy, without permission (Theft is when you remove the original), as long if you don't lie about it! Now be a good boy and stop being a Mule.


Copyright though, isn't needed, that violates Free Culture.
Creative Commons - Without No D. and No.C doesn't.
Public Domain - Free Culture for sure.

Edit: I guess I should post this picture too:

Sunday, April 27, 2014

Equestria Gaming - Review

Interesting Gaming Info
Horrible Admin - And Privacy Abuser
Bonus: Bullies People's Sexuality

I remember looking at this site at times, and one time I saw a really cool mod for Super Mario 64. It was wonderful to have all that freedom and such.
The website seemed to be a great place for gaming and such.
But I need to warn, this website doesn't have much freedom at all, it's actually biased. If you are a different person, and has a interesting Pony Mod, Fan game, etc. I suggest to go somewhere else.

One Horrible Admin - Plus Evidence
The Admin (Tuxxy) is a horrible person who has no idea how creativity or even proper criticism works (Edit: Yes, the lack of knowing what creativity works is part of the reason if he bashes fan projects based off that, which he did. Edit done). He reviews games only based off his biased opinions. If he sees a game He hates, he will most likely make fun of it, use misleading tags, bring a purpose out and compare it to something the project isn't. He does this only because He dislikes it.
It was also reported that He takes info from private chats and post them in public without the person's permission. Also heard that He took private chats out and altered it(It might of been the same person).
Info about this can be found here in the comments section:

This was also one of the projects that's been bashed for what it was.
I don't know the exact reasons why, but I could guess he bashed it just because it was similar to Mario (When a game is meant to be similar to Mario, then it's wrong to bring that out as a critique response).

I could also guess it was because it was a "self-insert" (Not to be confused with Mary-sue) when yet, a self-insert isn't even bad as if one person does that on purpose, that's the style of the game, and if one didn't like it, they don't have to play it. Bringing "self-insert" out just because it's a "self-insert" should be consider "rude" and "offensive".
Here is a link to that offensive article:
Note: The misleading tags of "creepypasta" and "survival horror".

I have also argued why it was offensive for him to review games like these in a very biased way, and also argued that what he does is "critique abuse", bringing out purposes for what it is instead of bringing out flaws that lacks the purpose or goes against the purpose.


Other evidence proving Intolerance

Yet, what he said in there "isn't" safe for work, but actually it is, because well, this is what babies creatures with diapers actually look like. Something tells me He thinks it's unsafe because of the person's interest. Even though, there is nothing wrong with a possible interest nor is it anymore extreme than kissing, etc.
Anyway, we now see corrupted bronies joining Tuxxy's dark side.
Edit: He said it was from a public chat, but the way he's doing this to the guy in front of everyone is still bullying. -I said earlier saying something like: It looks like he violated the person's privacy.- Edit done.

Edit: Did the guy delete my comment on that link? I remember him claiming that my so-called "off-topic" comments were to get deleted I think, but this comment on the other hand was 100 % on-topic (Off-topic talking isn't always a problem). Edit done


Bad and a unsafe website.
If you want your own fan-game submitted, maybe try another site.
If you want your privacy protected as well, I highly suggest to never talk to this guy in private.

If your brave enough to not care, judging that so called "critic" or other things may mean he will talk bad about you on his Twitter... And I do know, good Admins don't act like that.

CC - No-Derivatives Attribution
None of this can be modified, including deleting part of it, then republishing it.
I have caught someone (The same Admin - Tuxxy) making up a lie about my article. Assuming I rated "Him" bad only because of one small sided reason. And lied to everyone claiming that's what my article only said. That is not the case, if they were to read the whole thing, it's "different" as in, it's not just the reason or something.
Credit is Due, he needs to link to this article if he continues making up my reason.

Edit once more: I have told him to remove his lie..
Here is what he said to me:
Since he doesn't mind abusing privacy, guess I don't mind if I post this then.
Note: The big black text with the arrows and in this box was added text from the snapshots.
I also had to put two snapshots together due to the email being too big to fit.
This reply just makes him look even more bad. And because of that, I think I feel just a tiny bit better.


Edit: 5/17/2014
He also told people to boycott someone who posted a NSFW picture on a optional twitter somewhere, because he hated it (He also thought it was something "illegal" - has no understanding with law).

Soooo... yeah. Stay FAR away from him, and focus on people's rights, instead of bigoted hate.
It is said that it's very hard to change people, and that may be true. He may not change for a long time, so just stay away from him, have faith of the next life, or something.