Monday, June 30, 2014

Why Critics Are Wrong on Alpha and Omega

English isn't that good in terms of writing, but I believe it's good enough.
I've been understood a lot before and also been consider helpful to many kinds of things I think.

Critics are consider "important" for media pieces. Generally reviews can be very important for feedback, and suggestions to help find true flaws and fix them.

However, there are times when critics can be argued, and the fact that they can also be so abusive in terms of "critique" which serves no value to any kind of "importance". One of the major issues in "criticism" is apparently "movies" and one of the movies I like to point out as a big example is "Alpha and Omega".

Don't expect this as a review, it's more like "criticizing the "critics"". It might sound a bit like a final review a little though.

Do you think that a person giving a very negative score, based off of bias feeling serve any real value to the "importance" of criticism? The answer is no, it doesn't because if it "does", then "criticism" isn't important.
In other words: Critics that bash art-styles, story-designs, humor designs, and more, serves no real value to the "importance", nor does it serve any value to target and suggest the wrong audience or compare it to movies (whether they want it to be like another or suggest avoidance of it) unless the purpose of the main movie has something to do with them. Basically I don't think Critics exist to do that. They must exist for important things by suggesting that possibly, a purpose can fail to offer it's value, and also suggest more things. E.g. I take food critics more seriously because they often find any flaws for it's main design, taste, etc, etc.

Since it's consider important in terms of critique and other proper suggestions, then I will explain why the main area of critics are overly, and embarrassingly wrong over this film.

Reason #1
One of the "large criticism" of this film is that it's used ideas from other movies and then suggest that adults may get bored, which somehow "confirms" that a movie (for a whole different audience) means that it's a "flaw".

The problem with this is that the main purpose of this whole movie was generally targeted at kids, not adults.
Since it's very much suggested and proven that young people can like this movie, then guess what? This movie did a fine job for what they purposely did. Also, I must mention that it's what they did on purpose and it's a story style. Styles are never a flaw on it's self, no matter how you compare them with other things.

Comparing it to the wrong audience and then claiming the movie to be "bad" when yet, many people (probably the young ones) liked it serves no value into this kind of criticism.
It's as if it doesn't have blood in it, it's somehow bad because some adults who expected "R-Rated" films got disappointed because it was a PG-rated film.
The major possible problem is that if we both made it enjoyable for both, then we may delete something that many other people (from kids or certain adults?) would of liked.. Proving that purpose should be more of the judge.

It's kind of true that "certain people" got bored so I can't argue that part it's self, but I can argue that the story was it's purpose, and the style (as I've said before), and for kids and those who like the stories. It was also proven to work, thus making the story of the film good for what it is. I will show why it worked later on this article.

I've found this review:
I do disagree with certain claims because it does kind of bring out the "using element" thing as a "flaw" I think, and I also disagree with the scoring but it seems to show that this guy enjoys the main "love style" of people. Some people might claim that "love stories" like this can be "boring", but once again, maybe this isn't your type?

Reason #2
Another kind of criticism (May not be as much) was that it copied ideas from other movies. Because of so, it somehow means that the movie as a whole or in bits, somehow means that it's a "flaw" now.

Once they realize that originality doesn't exist, maybe they will think different?
The point is that using a similar idea doesn't make a movie bad because of the fact that kids and other types of audience can enjoy similar ideas. Even if it was used a lot.

The biggest fact is that every movie has done this. E.g. Toy Story 2 has used an element from Star Wars, and what they did with it was actually pretty clever and funny.
It's copied from Star Wars, but it seems good on it's own as some creativity with the same idea or something.
Here is something very interesting too:

Alpha and Omega has done similar things and from what I can see, they have used creative ideas under some ideas already being used, just like Toy Story 2, and many, and I mean many other films as well. Some people may not be a fan of this but since there are a lot of people that enjoys similar ideas being used and that this is also a main purpose of the film, then it's not exactly a flaw. Otherwise it's like calling a work a flaw just because it's different.
Kids and even some Adults love things like this. If I want to see a movie used a good legendary idea like say, the train scene, then I'm glad they did!

Reason #3
There are some "critics" that declare the art-style of Alpha and Omega are somehow a "problem". Some thinks they are "ugly", some compares it to real-life, etc, etc.

The simple truth is that a "Art-Style" or "Design" can never be consider a flaw, unless maybe it's a failed attempt of a different purpose and currently still trying to imitate something else. However, according to some info I've found online, the designs of the mid-anthropomorphic wolves are actually done on purpose.

I've also like to bring this out.
As I've said, it's not possible for a "Art Style" or "Design" to ever be a flaw. Anyone who said they are either dislikes it personality or are comparing them to the things they avoided (e.g. "this world's wolves"), doesn't properly bring any value to actual critique.

Reason #4
Some people seem to bring out "sex jokes" as a "flaw". Though, I'll have to say that many PG-rated movies have done this before. Even on TV-Shows. If it's too much, then another point may be good but simply just because it has a "sex joke" doesn't make it a bad movie. Slight, tamed down jokes or non-jokes involving sexuality seems to fit well with "PG". It's not a G-rated movie, it's a PG-rated movie. If it seems too much that it can dangerously effects kids or violates the PG rating, then you may make a good point in terms of "sex jokes" or other sexual contents.

Since some say that "kids won't get it" but "adults will", then it's probably not much of a problem.

Other Type of Reasons
Some say this film is a "failure" but since that's so absurd and to why I think so, then I would like to point out the fact that a lot of people actually loved the film and according to Wikipedia:
 "The film ended its run on December 2, 2010 after grossing $25 million domestically and $25 million in other territories.[2] Produced on a $20 million budget, the film had been declared a financial success, and is Lionsgate's highest-grossing animated feature, as well as Crest Animation's highest."
I also want to say that for some reason, the wikipedia of this page keeps changing. Not sure why though.

I've also heard it's gotten a "cult following" fan base but now it's not at wikipedia anymore? This is strange and I just noticed the reason why it isn't there now was because it "wasn't source" or something, however, it's true that there is a fandom going around that involves this movie and it's sequels.

There has also been a couple of videos on Youtube that were very biased against the film and when I went to one of the videos, it was disliked a lot and lot's of people were pissed off at the guy. I can understand why because it's very biased and all wrong not only because the review arguments were so weak and very biased, but there was a general amount of dislike of this review, proving that they as audiences, loved it.

Meanwhile, there are some "haters of this film" that pretends "wolf fans" "furries", or for any sake, "fans" don't count. Now that does not for any reason whatsoever make any sense! Movies are made for the purpose of interest and they can be made for a certain audience target. Since this movie is focused on wolves, and the fact that it seems good as a mid-anthropomorphic type of style, then those people liking that obviously count. Otherwise it's like going into an Anime film and pretending that anime fans don't count as feedback.
I will also say that "fans" are direct feedback, as it's part of the main point as to why media entertainment exist. Fans are people that already prove that the film was enjoyed because they are already the ones that enjoyed the film.
Pretending that "non-fans" only count is not only hypocritical, but very bigoted.

From what I can study, the film Alpha and Omega actually did a near-perfect job as it's own film and coming from a small company.

For my own reason, I can't tell on everything of the film for now but I may say that it's NOT a perfect film, but it's not even bad. The story is enough for what it is to be enjoyed for certain audience and the main purpose of the film is directed at those. It also doesn't matter if certain ideas were "already used" or not. Some criticism of this film is actually biased and serves no real feed-back as they suggest things the original makers avoided. It's fair to say that those kinds of critics are wrong for there scoring because they failed to prove that somehow "films" must make the "wrong audience" happy in order for it to be good. The predictions of "failure" were already disproved as well.

What happened was that this film went good for certain audiences (Not 100% but it has enough) and the general haters who complain are often the ones who expected a whole different style that the makers didn't even do, and pretended that there "opinions" were superior or counted for a score. Though, the main target was kids and for certain fans and that's been kind of proven successfully.

For "Not 100%", this goes to any other movie in the world. I personality didn't like the movie Frozen that much and I wasn't a big fan of singing but I will never consider it a flaw because it's the style.

It's impossible for a movie to be liked by everyone in this entire world. There will probably always be a time that one person will not like it. We have gens, and different audiences and if we need "criticism", we need to use them for the main purposes. Not suggest "flaws" because some people hated the style of any film.

Not only certain criticism of this film offends the culture of those who enjoys remixing, but it can make others feel bad for there "own things" who wanted to be inspired by yet, another similar idea.

Anyway, some criticism might make some good points, but the general hatred of this film by some are really absurd.
Go on, and embrace Alpha and Omega if you want, even if it somehow had a lot of "flaws". 

A real good critique shall never compare a purpose to another purpose that has nothing to do with the original's purpose.  -Remember these words.


I would like to ask for critique suggestions for my writing on here.
Copyright - Republish is allowed as long if people don't re-edit this other than the purpose of better writing of it's main point.

I do not claim Copyright to the links or the first picture nor some of the content in the "Art Style" pictures.

Friday, June 27, 2014

Tuxxy - One of Worst "Brony's" Ever

Not a very serious attempt of an edit

I feel sorry for those who live with this guy.. There is a "scientifically possible" chance that he has at least lied to ALL of his "friends" or family members once.

I'm honestly kind of getting tired of talking about him I think, but what he said to me, and getting away with a pathetic highly immature excuse, just made me want to continue..
This is especially for him defending his excuses of taking things out of private and claiming that chatting on Skype "isn't" private.

Since he gives no craps about taking stuff out of private chatting (Possibly lie about it too), then I guess I will just talk about this:

I talked to him that his recent article on Horse "News" was a made up title, to get attention.. I said that to him on Skype.. All he said was something of: "I stopped bothering you", and then possibly blocked me on there for a while (Edit: No he told me on Skype that he didn't" Edit done). Honestly man, you can't simply say "I stopped bothering you" right after posting a stupid immature article about me on a popular website. I think he said that because he feels fulfilled/accomplishing his mission.

It's as he thinks it's "fair" when it's really not. If he were to stop bothering me, and wanted me to fairly "leave" him alone, then he would of not made that article and leave it there.. He would also apologize to what he did in the past, and with other people and also delete that other article.

No Tuxxy, all you did was get upset, and whine EVERYTIME you get criticized for how badly selfish you were. You censor other people's arguments, because you worry you will be "wrong" or at least be known that you are a horrible selfish bias prick to others, including to me.

If you were to be more loved by more bronies, then you wouldn't be doing stuff like this to other people.

No really people, he basically, sadistically enjoy lying about others, for attention, and fun.
He's completely intolerance about other people's interest, projects, etc. I've also been told that Tuxxy lied about someone for someone kindly asking him to be non-hateful over someone's project, and of course you know what happens next.

This is why I god damn hate this prick. Since no one knows his horrible ego self, then all I could do is help spread the word. Not only to suggest people going for better, matured people, but to also keep private information safe, and true.
I'll also like to note that he'd also lied about a reason as to why I flagged someone's comment on his site, and lied about how I reviewed his site bad.

I'm not trying to be mean to this guy, all I'm doing is reacting to real world problems that he's been causing to others. I'm not some guy who just likes "talking bad" about this guy. I'm the type of guy who reacts based off hateful, selfish, unfair crap that's been happening to this world and honestly, he's been causing those kinds of things and he made it worse to what he's been immaturely doing to me, and to others possibly.

For all he did, I only see him as a "popufur/brony" who seeks nothing but attention, without a care of lying about others and causing hatred to feed off a bigoted opinion about other people.
I'm picturing him in his chair, leaning back and smiling because of how popular this sadistic is. Mainly because of his own site (or blog site for that matter) having over 1-million views.

I am so glad that I'm not a Brony anymore and I have my own reasons on why!


The Little Deal
If you were to AT LEAST reverse your hatred,  unfairness, and lies (e.g. Made up "interview") about me off of that website, by deleting those articles, then maybe I will stop talking about you!

Seriously, have an open mind and understand what I'm god damn saying.
Will you react more honest, and open or just make another unfunny (possibly lying) article on that website again?

Friday, June 20, 2014

Updating The Comments

I've decided to replace the old comments system with another system.

I think it's for the better anyway.

Yet, the reply system on the new one should be better.

Thursday, June 19, 2014

This is Why I'm For Regulating Hate Speech

-bobbie - From a comment somewhere.
For the above picture, it can be found here:
The above picture is from the very first comment. It's not the whole comment from the snapshot though. 
I'll also like to note that bobbie's comment doesn't have that great English I think, but it's good enough to understand.

There are a lot of other comments that disagree for actually, possibly, good reasons I think.
Negative speech has been proven to cause pain, suffering, and other problems to many kinds of people.
If people are allowed to bash others for who they are, then that would be promoting censorship, because it causes those to hide, not speak up, and possibly censor themselves for the rest of there lives, thanks to discrimination, and any other forms of hatred. It's not just censorship.

It's not just what's legally consider "Hate Speech", it's also any form of negative/hatred speech. Such as a lifestyle for example or other things you couldn't control (At least what's not consider Sexual Orientation (Though should be) for example). Also, the Law shouldn't define that "Hate Speech" only includes what's some US law meanings mean. Hate speech should be consider any message that's pretty much "hatred": I.e. Speech base off hating anyone or anything from the person. Or anything for that matter.

The legal meaning is based off "opinion" (Yet, partly right). Yet, there are those who don't include "Religion" and there are those who do include "Religion". Yet again, these are just names some people decided to add, so therefor, it would be legit to include "lifestyle" and more things..

Either way, negativity of any kind against a person's interest or lifestyle has caused many issues, and suffering; which is another form of pain.

Many people suffered due to bigoted, ignorance, and other hatred ideas. This is why I'm for regulating it.
If we had much more negativity in our history, then lot's of people who would already express themselves in this Universe, would of been hidden in the other Universe where the history was worse. There would also be more suicide, pain, and suffering.

Thanks to fighting back, it's not as bad to the vision I just had, but our current one still needs work.


For the belief that "Freedom of Speech" means to say anything you want:
If I had to believe that Hate Speech should be banned (I.e. Somehow shouldn't count for the US constitution), then I would include regulations on other speeches that some people don't define "Hate Speech".

Why? For the SAME reasons.

So I've Been Wrong on Fair Use Maybe

Believe it or not, Tuxxy who argued for his claims might be right. Including if a "parody" purpose article had little Satire in it.

So what now? Unnecessarily make fun of me just because I've made a mistake? Go ahead, go right ahead.
At least I do something very rare and actually admit that I've made a possibly longing mistake.

Even though that article may be "Fair Use" after all, that doesn't change the god damn fact that the beliefs while making that article can still be wrong. Nor does it make Tuxxy look "good". Even if he got popularity as popularity doesn't count. In fact, most of the fandom is closed minded, and seeing a popular brony site doing nothing but damaging others, and hurting others with there negativity just further proves my point.
If you want to argue, THEN TRY. Go ahead.

Also, that article isn't funny. The only ones who laugh are pretty much the sheep them selves.

He failed to argue his points directly at all. He just goes out and say "bullshit". Though, only one of them is right when it comes to Fair Use.

At least I'm not giving up on MLPcritic's article... Info (A little edited too) from a article currently in Draft:

There is another article on that horse news site that's even worse, and even more confusing but it's from a different person.  The person tried plagiarizing the images, by claiming them as there own. I'll list out the problems for that one... Yikes:
  1. First picture was completely mostly edited and lacked the main point of the original picture. *Note - Image is removed thanks to a DMCA request through imgur I think.
  2. Purpose is to make fun of the artist (or writer for that matter) than to make fun of the work it's self.
  3. Article might be for "Parody" and "Criticism" but having both may no longer be consider Fair Use, since it's confusing and that I think you can only choose one.
  4. I think someone claimed to be for "Criticism" but the person does nothing but act all bias rather than finding much of any real flaws. Critics are supposed to be less bias, and for finding real errors, not used it as an excuse for hate. There is a reason why people can actually argue critics and why there is a label for "bad criticism" and "good criticism".
  5. Another picture was edited just a tiny bit but the person claimed that the picture is "there's now" or something. Which is plagiarism, even if that was a joke.
  6. Did not give out ANY source links
  7. Probably more
Though, I'm still unsure if you can really use more than one purpose.

The same person also did claim that I somehow am "violating" Freedom of Expression.. When honestly, I will claim I'm not because for example, Anti-Gay messages also counts as some form of expression, but since it promotes negativity to many others (Trigger for bullying too), then I think making "laws" "rules" or other regulations doesn't violate it because of the fact that the trigger promotes censorship, not allowing. The point of "Golden Rule" "laws" is to help protect each other, including Freedom of Expression. Though the US government isn't perfect at that. Then again, I'm more about "suggestion" rather than "force/just/laws" I think.

He also claim something like "Oh that's all your opinion, made up, etc"
Well sir, the Laws, we already had, is made up. If we had no enforcement by any opinion (Protecting rights is an opinion probably), then we wouldn't have any Government, Laws, Police, or anything. Everyone would be free to use any free will, including the "abusive types" that violate others free will.
The only "enforcement" would be using Free Will to fight back naturally.. Meaning no Law, or any Rules.. Just "hitting back with your fist" ways.

RIGHT AND WRONG is an opinion too. Yet, Golden Rule takes a big part in that belief and since many people have different views on it. I'm the guy who wants to help change the world, and it's not anything different from what people already did like regulating anti-gay messages for example.
*Note* Me suggesting Gold Rule being some law or something isn't anything different from the main laws we already have. Get it?

Anyway, happy now? Are you happy that you may be correct about the fair use part? Yes, I'm talking to Tuxxy, the same man who claimed bullshit over my other theories that he still failed to argue. The same guy who takes private info out and twist words. The same guy who recently claimed that "private chats" are "not" private.
*Note, I think he admitted his mistake on one not true statement, but I don't see him fixing that in the public. His comment that lies about me is still there.

Listen man, just because you proved one point about Copyright, doesn't make you right on the embarrassments you did in the past. Nor does it make you look good.


If I were to make up with you and never talk "bad about you", then it would be awesome to delete those two hateful articles about me, and never speak of this again somehow.

Copyright - wwwarea
If use, then it must somehow be Fair Use. >_>
Already allowed to spread this for the purpose of info spreading, like what I talked about of Right or Wrong.

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Importing Info #1 - About a Very Flawed Website

Since "Important Info" on the pages section  isn't getting much views on this blog, I've decided to put this on the front page for at this time...

Important Info!
For future viewers mainly.

I'll also paste the main info from that page:

"What did to me was very unpleasant. There actions were very hurtful, hypocritical, and in poor taste. Anyone who gets linked here from that website should not listen to what the website has said about me. What they tried to do, was ruin my reputation of it, trying to turn it all into a "joke".

There purpose, and insults are very biased and failed to prove any of there points about me.
Any educated person shall know that science, knowledge, etc, etc will always be more important than "biased opinions". Unless your opinions is just plain, harmless interests.

I will say, they only made SOME "good" points, such as my spelling mistake about how I spelled "retarded" wrong, but them just pointing one spelling error out and putting it out for the public to laugh at (I already corrected the word), isn't necessary.

I will say, them being very closed about other people just proves more of my main, general point about the fandom though. I am not against the fandom, I'm just bringing out how big of a lie "tolerance" is these days.

I highly suggest being very open, and focus on the idea of a better, loving tolerated world."

CC - No-Derivatives Attribution
None of this can be modified, including deleting part of it when republishing it.
*Note: I sadly always feel the need to put these licenses up because I have a feeling if I don't, some troll will then put them on a website to cause trouble.

Sunday, June 15, 2014

This is Mainly Why I Gave Equestria Gaming a Bad Score

Sometime recently, I decided to send a "fake report" of a comment just so I can comment to Tuxxy about how silly his move was for disabling comment ratings or something. Notice now there will never be ratings ever again because one guy used a proxy to "cheat" the ratings. He also should just turn off the whole comments because there are also people bypassing bans. Hehehe
*Note: What is the point of disabling ratings? Ratings can be abused simply by using them based of bias hate.

Anyway, remember when I reported that Tuxxy would take private messages outside of the private zone, and then possibly, twist the words? One person on Youtube told me a story about this, and now after what happened, it turns out to be more true after all. Guess I wasn't overreacting after all!

He did the same thing to me..

He published a comment, not only abusing his responsibility as an Admin, but also lied about my message I sent through the report. Claiming I did for (and in quotes): "This comment is discriminating hate speech".
Of course, I would probably report hatred comments, but for this one, I didn't do it for that reason.

I had to once again, find a way to comment on that blog post and suggest that Tuxxy was lying again, and say something like "I did not do that". Of course though, he deleted/censored me after successfully finding a way.

Before, I even commented, I sent him another report message asking him to send me of what I said in the original report, and I still have not got the email. After that and the comment, I decided to just send him an email through Hotmail, and ask him for the message. Did I get a response? No sir I didn't!

See kids? This is one of the strong reasons as to why I hate this horrible Brony and this is why I have to warn people of this huge embarrassment. Someone else should run that gamer blog. I don't even think this person is old enough to handle a popular site. The worst part in that case is that I might be more younger than him, and I already know more responsibility.

Also, the reason why I still even bother with that possible troll is that he's been acting like an ass to me, and to some others through Twitter, and other places.

As I been saying: Stay away from him!

Copyright - wwwarea
None of this can be republish on the following websites:

For other sites, please ask and if I give permission, you must provide the whole thing, and give a link to the original page, which is this.

For the purpose of making people aware of this problem, you may re post, as a whole with credit.

I will not claim legal claims to ideas: You are of course free to help spread this idea.

Thursday, June 12, 2014

Proud to be an Introvert

Being an Introvert has made me smart a lot. It made me analyze the way society has been acting to many different kinds of people. E.g. I realize that the term "Normal", "Weird", "Disorder", etc, etc.. is all but an illusion.
I would have fear, that if I was an Extrovert, then I would also be a sheep.. Why is that I say? It's because if I was more social (i.e. Being a loud-mouth and being active without thinking about my self once), then I probably would never have time to question the corruption this world has, nor would I realize that being who you are is the only good thing. I would only follow lies and the only "smart thing" I would have is computers.

I hate Society, but I don't hate a society it's self. I have my reasons on why.
I believe the way our current society is, is disgusting.. In society, violence in some ways (e.g. hunting other animals) is accepted while a small talk of something completely natural (i.e. sexuality) isn't. Society also uses the term "Normal" and "Weird" in the worst way as possible. It puts things in taboos, and more.

I am free. I have woken up, I once, been a bigot just like the main part of the world.
I used to hate something just because it was liked by certain people or something, then, after finding my self more, that is no more. When I started thinking for my self, I studied so much, it woke me up from this world, that is similar to "Hell".

Oh My God, You Are Anti-Social!
Please, just please, stop comparing me to the same people who enjoys violating rights of others. Please don't compare me to Murderers, Rapist, etc. Yet, comparing things of this type was another reason why I AM an Asocial.

There is a difference by being an Introvert or a Asocial than to "anti-social".
An Introvert is similar to asocial, where I avoid talking to others sometimes or all the time, where "anti-social" may include serious crimes like "Murder" for example. It's often about careless people that involves others.
Yet, society them selves is careless in different kinds of ways.

Does simply questioning the way society has been acting in some parts, makes me an "anti-social"?

If me choosing my differences in life makes you think I'm "anti-social", then you are disgusting.

If me criticizing the way society's been acting makes you think I'm "anti-social", then you are disgusting.
In other words, if believing in change for a better world makes you think I'm "anti-social", then not only you are "disgusting", you are sheep.

Apparently, anyone who is consider "weird" or "disturbing" may be consider "anti-social".
In fact, anyone who doesn't want to be social, doesn't want to make friends, always enjoy being alone, etc, etc. might make people think they are "anti-social" when really, it does NOT make them anti-social, instead, it's Asocial: To avoid socially talking to anyone.

I my self, do make friends sometimes, but I don't want to be any part of that "cool" zone crap. Never have, never will. Though, I have friends who might be part of it, but at least they may respect me who hates being part of it.
So I may not be 100% Asocial, but I have my reasons why I mostly am.

I want a world where people can express themselves for being different, even if some people consider themselves "weird". Just because the person expresses something that current society hates, doesn't automatically mean they are "Anti-Social", they are just different.

I love being different, it makes me feel more creative, it's interesting, it's fun, it's spiritual, it's god damn awesome!

If society calls that a "disorder" by them claiming that it's "Anti-Social", or not, then this is one of the strong reasons on why (Sort of) I am an Asocial and an Introvert.. Introvert might be something I can't control though, but I do have reasons on why I have hatred towards our current world and this problem I'm addressing now is one of them.

Note: Even non-social people can do horrible things just like parts of society.


I found this picture on a website somewhere...


CC: Attribution - No Derivatives
I do not claim legal ownership over any pictures I share through links.

Friday, June 6, 2014

Importing Info #2 - Horse News Think I'm a "World Issue"

Perhaps they are "butt-hurt" (A troll term) just because I reviewed the site and there friend, bad, based off actual reasons.

They claim that I'm an "issue" to the world now.

Where is the proof of that?

If the meaning has to mean that I'm an issue to there bigoted, pathetic, ignorant beliefs, then "sure" I am. Sure...

However, the real "World Issues/Problems" is really Society. It's very proven that being hateful over someone's likes, life-style, sexuality types, etc. etc. is the real issue. It has caused pain, suicide, etc.
Calling me an "issue" or "problem" for honestly revealing the truth about the idiotic crap of society is honestly disgusting. The ones who call me that are just wanting to put people back to sleep and continue causing the real problems...
They may also be calling me an issue for saying that hurtful, hatred, etc. to be bad. Which is also sick and horrible.

Perhaps, Horse-"news" (Some of it's members like Tuxxy and MLP"critic") is a "world issue".
I have asked them for proof of there ignorant claims over me. I asked them when I argued like 3 -5 times through email, and in comments. After, did I mainly get any evidence that debunks my claims?

The answer: Nothing

Both of those idiots (One of them can't even draw) has made no real criticism of any sort (Besides ONE tiny mistake that they brought out of me). It's nothing but immaturely name-calling, immaturely biased, poor taste, delusional, and more. All they do is use people for humor as an "answer".
Worst of all I think: They think popularity is more important than words.
They really need to educate them-selves.

This is one hell of an example of a "World Issue" and always will be.

Biggest World Issues I know so far:
  • Biased > Facts
  • Biased > Evidence
  • Popularity > Facts or Evidence
  • Judging other likes but not there own
  • Judging other likes either way
  • Lying about others is alright
  • Comparing Plagiarism to "Fair" use
  • Copying means "theft"
  • Biased hatred
I mainly bring these out.

One main purpose of my writing for this blog is for the purpose of:
For the purpose of promoting Free Speech, Free Culture and Expression. (All may be same) Sometimes to promote to legalize stuff, have more chances, and speak against limited believes. 
All for the purpose of our natural freedom.

Note: I'm not very perfect though I think.

Calling me a World Issue for criticizing people who tries to ruin reputation of others, or using them for "humor" or "cringe" (Same?) IS a world issue/problem. Always has, and always will be.
Doing so also causes negative effects to "Free Speech, Free Culture, and Expression".

Like I said, stay away from that site and go out and be yourself. Stand up! Whatever your freedom says.

There is also those who will make fun of the term "Freedom".. Ignore those sheep.


CC: Attribution - No Derivatives

I also would ask for some critique criticism, for making this post look more attractive! Please be honest, and mature though.
Of course, bringing out spelling errors or other possible errors is also fine. I suggest once more, be honest about it.