They claim that I'm an "issue" to the world now.
Where is the proof of that?
If the meaning has to mean that I'm an issue to there bigoted, pathetic, ignorant beliefs, then "sure" I am. Sure...
However, the real "World Issues/Problems" is really Society. It's very proven that being hateful over someone's likes, life-style, sexuality types, etc. etc. is the real issue. It has caused pain, suicide, etc.
Calling me an "issue" or "problem" for honestly revealing the truth about the idiotic crap of society is honestly disgusting. The ones who call me that are just wanting to put people back to sleep and continue causing the real problems...
They may also be calling me an issue for saying that hurtful, hatred, etc. to be bad. Which is also sick and horrible.
Perhaps, Horse-"news" (Some of it's members like Tuxxy and MLP"critic") is a "world issue".
I have asked them for proof of there ignorant claims over me. I asked them when I argued like 3 -5 times through email, and in comments. After, did I mainly get any evidence that debunks my claims?
The answer: Nothing
Both of those idiots (One of them can't even draw) has made no real criticism of any sort (Besides ONE tiny mistake that they brought out of me). It's nothing but immaturely name-calling, immaturely biased, poor taste, delusional, and more. All they do is use people for humor as an "answer".
Worst of all I think: They think popularity is more important than words.
They really need to educate them-selves.
This is one hell of an example of a "World Issue" and always will be.
Biggest World Issues I know so far:
- Biased > Facts
- Biased > Evidence
- Popularity > Facts or Evidence
- Judging other likes but not there own
- Judging other likes either way
- Lying about others is alright
- Comparing Plagiarism to "Fair" use
- Copying means "theft"
- Biased hatred
One main purpose of my writing for this blog is for the purpose of:
For the purpose of promoting Free Speech, Free Culture and Expression. (All may be same) Sometimes to promote to legalize stuff, have more chances, and speak against limited believes.
All for the purpose of our natural freedom.
Note: I'm not very perfect though I think.
Calling me a World Issue for criticizing people who tries to ruin reputation of others, or using them for "humor" or "cringe" (Same?) IS a world issue/problem. Always has, and always will be.
Doing so also causes negative effects to "Free Speech, Free Culture, and Expression".
Like I said, stay away from that site and go out and be yourself. Stand up! Whatever your freedom says.
There is also those who will make fun of the term "Freedom".. Ignore those sheep.
Also:
http://multiversefeeling.blogspot.com/p/what-horse-news.html
http://multiversefeeling.blogspot.com/p/hall-of-shame.html
http://multiversefeeling.blogspot.com/2014/05/a-little-story.html
http://worldsoffurry.wordpress.com/2014/05/15/horse-news-review/
CC: Attribution - No Derivatives
I also would ask for some critique criticism, for making this post look more attractive! Please be honest, and mature though.
Of course, bringing out spelling errors or other possible errors is also fine. I suggest once more, be honest about it.
> Biggest World Issues I know so far:
ReplyDeleteYou make me absolutely /sick./
You try to suggest that the biggest fucking issues in society are your own butthurt problems with people making you all mad because they decide to rip into your horrible opinions. How about hunger? How about equality? How about war, genocide, and the animosity of nations? Ever think the world doesn't revolve around some fucking site? Write about something that /matters/ for once, versus being so fucking hung up on this entire Horse News debacle.
I think your kind of sick honestly. You do know people have the right to stand up for themselves. That means people can talk about any problem in this fucked up world, including Horse-News.
DeleteI was attacked with there delusional crap, in front of public (Also on a popular site vs a smaller blog) and since this is a problem of me, why can't I fucking speak up?
I'm aware there are other problems but my god, that doesn't mean I can't talk about this.
Also, stop using the term "butt-hurt". - That's like saying a Gay person can't stand up because he is "butt-hurt"/offended by someone's hatred. Just because I'm standing up based off my own reaction, doesn't make it anymore less right. This involves me and I have the right to argue regardless of any reason, or feeling.
"How about equality?"
I already covered that. Society has a fucked up system where they don't accept equal expression. AT ALL
____
Also to let you understand me more. I write about World Issues in the "Living debate", meaning I find problems while people are trying to live after trying to survive.. Like if people worked so hard to live on this horrid planet, then people deserve to have a GOOD LIFE. I mainly cover issues while living.
Please understand that with an open mind.
Plus, the things I list out generally are very big, and a huge issue. It's also connected to suicide (Most of it at least), and other pain. I believe these are very big, while living.
This website isn't a basic trying to live problem, it's about issues while living. Just like how Techdirt makes issues in terms of "Intellectual Property".
Get it? >_>
Just like how Techdirt talks about issues in terms of "Intellectual Property".* -Fixed
DeleteYou're insinuating that society is so fucking horrible because you got ripped into by a goddamn /humour/ site. You're acting like this entire thing is an example of the state of society when instead you're just blowing up an issue that in all honesty /does not matter./
DeleteIt doesn't matter if it's humor or not. It's not funny, nor does it look like it's even for humor.. Example: One article actually was serious about me which is sad.. Was there humor? "Kind of" but it wasn't joking about me, the person was trying to seriously claim shitty stuff about me FOR the purpose of humor possibly...
DeleteHonestly, that's still fucking terrible. Calling me "dumb", promoting unequally, or other insults for humor doesn't give them a pass, and doing it for humor, makes it offensive still.
Think of it like this: Bringing out someone who is black, and using that as an excuse for humor. "Hey don't worry guyz this guy is black so he is worthless! Hahahaha!" That's just fucked up. PERIOD. The same goes for using "Autism" as a threat, bringing out my likes (but not there own) as a threat, etc, etc. Doing that for humor is JUST as offensive as doing it without humor. And should never "un-count" as intolerance.
Even if it was all a joke and they didn't mean it for real, that doesn't change the fact from how effected it can be.
___
For humor or not, what they claim about me is delusional and screwed up, and STILL deserves to be argued. And YES, it's still an example of a "fucked up society".
Yet, failing for them to argue back with real evidence just shows how right I was about them.
Yet, it's part of other things that insulted Gays, Bronies/Furries, Blacks, Whites, "Disability", etc etc.. Also, please don't get offended by comparing brony to furry because furry means anthro, and the ponies are anthro. :P
"It doesn't matter if it's humor or not. It's not funny, nor does it look like it's even for humor."
DeleteHmmm, okay, so suddenly you're now an expert on what qualifies as humor? You're going on this whole crusade because you feel your ego is threatened and that some people ended up making fun of you, and by extension, you feel that you're necessarily more intelligent than those who criticize you? You think that just because you're making claims as to what is and isn't humorous/good/[insert any abstract idea here] that everyone is somehow going to think of you as this awesome, smart, revolutionary guy? Listen dude, if you believe all that stuff, you're definitely very delusional. There's so much logical friction in the many things you claim to believe. I could give examples, but I honestly don't have the time right this second to compile everything that I've seen on this blog that proves my point.
The fact of the matter is, wwwarea, is that no matter where you go either on the internet or in the world at large, there will ALWAYS be people who criticize and make fun of you. And yes, the fact is, some of it will possibly be actual hate speech. But let's look at what you're reacting to now: Horse News.
Yes, we get that 4chan is a bad place, and I get the feeling that that's part of the reason you're reacting so strongly to Horse News (i.e. because they're basically an offshoot of /mlp/). But the fact is, as bad as 4chan's reputation is, you can't lump all the different boards on that site into a single "evil amalgamated conglomerate." I don't think that you realize, though, that as bad as even the worst boards on 4chan are (e.g. /b/, /v/, etc.), there are some anons on there that may have a dark sense of humor, but who actually do good in the world. Hell, take Anonymous as an example. Sure, they started out as a shady, hacking movement on the web that targeted people maliciously. But the thing about Anonymous is that it ended up dividing into different subsections. And the thing about Anonymous today is that they rally against abuses within society that both governments and individuals have committed. So let me just say now, you can't just lump all of 4chan, or /mlp/, for that matter.
The fact is that Horse News, in their first article that they did about you, was just poking fun at you. They highlighted things you said in your blog in the Cringe Corner series. Yeah, the way they approached it was harsh. But, let me ask you this: was it unfounded? Have you ever thought that maybe your ideas were maybe flawed or incomplete? That maybe you didn't have the whole picture? That maybe there's more out there for you to learn? I know that sounds like I'm begging the question, but I am legitimately curious if you ever thought at one time that maybe all your theories/ideas/beliefs were not exactly founded in sound logic.
DeleteEither way, you have to learn, wwwarea, that this type of stuff, whether it's right or not, is going to happen no matter what you do. You alone will not change anything. You're not some special little snowflake who's going to revolutionize things (hell, even you claim that originality isn't real, so maybe you will understand that). And your little crusade here, from an outsider's perspective looks absolutely absurd. It is both cringeworthy and saddening at the same time. The fact is, the more you resist this criticism in the way you are now, the more you're going to get. You keep feeding into a vicious cycle of criticism and counter-criticism that's not going to get you anywhere. You're not going to ever take down Horse News. You won't by yourself change the world. Don't delude yourself otherwise. The best thing you can do is either fade into obscurity or just learn to roll with what they say about you and learn to maybe laugh at yourself or look at yourself in a different light. The fact that you take yourself so seriously is what's causing you all this drama.
"Hmmm, okay, so suddenly you're now an expert on what qualifies as humor? You're going on this whole crusade because you feel your ego is threatened and that some people ended up making fun of you, and by extension, you feel that you're necessarily more intelligent than those who criticize you? "
DeleteYour basically saying a black person can't stand up against against a "humor" article to poke fun at them for supporting equality for black people. Since this article was hurtful, and it's completely unnecessary, I have the rights as a victim to suggest that.
Articles that tries to ruin reputations, hurt others for who they are, etc etc are NEVER funny and I have a right to say that. It's like the debate on if "rape jokes" are funny or not. Honestly, they are NOT funny to mainly rape victims (I think) for example.
"Listen dude, if you believe all that stuff, you're definitely very delusional."
Listen dude, no one has disprove me, and I'll admit, I have made some small mistakes like one argument about fair use for example, but those shitty articles at Horse news are nothing but bias arguments and has no value for ANY form of argument.
You are pretty delusional. Especially if you think that a theory I've made is "proven wrong" when that's not even close to true. No one has tried criticizing them. All I got was "bullshit" and that's it; failing to make any real valid points for themselves.
"The fact of the matter is, wwwarea, is that no matter where you go either on the internet or in the world at large, there will ALWAYS be people who criticize and make fun of you. And yes, the fact is, some of it will possibly be actual hate speech. But let's look at what you're reacting to now: Horse News."
Try telling that to gay people in 1950, tell them that they "can't" speak up. Tell them, they will "never" change the fucking world. Honestly, you are nothing but naysayers who don't believe in anything but doubts. I might be going too far with this but honestly, the ones who criticize me made no real points accept for one spelling error and one fair use argument.
I've been told that they are trolls and has no real value into arguments, they just do something because they felt like it.
And sure, I don't think I was saying everything about it is bad.. Horse news did actually had news for once. But in a general way, based off the way people act. That it's self, is bad.
And ego? The stupid OP in first place is all for "ego".
Besides, what makes you have the right to define humor by suggesting it's "funny" over things that does nothing but hurt others, ruin reputations, etc?
Delete@Alptraum Mond They poked fun at me for no actual reason. I've ask Tuxxy or MLPCritic to argue why they think I'm wrong.. And they failed. They also bring out my likes as a "flaw". How the hell is that "right"? Why the hell would I think that it's "fair"?
DeleteAll I see is that they are trolls who don't believe in debating and poke fun at me, based off bias reasoning. Similar to some bad satire websites..
If I were to make a Satire article, it would never be like that. Only for the purpose to poke fun at people who causes real, hatred problems.
Also, saying "I can't change anything" is very flawed. History saids "Hi." and laughs at the same time.. People (Not just through Internet) has been able to change things before, and it's possible that I can help that. You are carrying doubts based off (possibly) popularity when yet, that's not an actual science fact to bring out as a reason. The truth is that you don't know that and the very hard cold truth is that people HAS changed things before, and I'm just one of those guys who believes I can help. Saying "I can't change anything" is the very hypocritical thing..
I barely think I've been wrong besides a couple of issues, but I've ask them that and they are never honest. They will defend any ridiculous thing as possible..
That shitty horse "news" article about me is very bias and serves NO VALUE to any real debating and it's fair to say that. Saying "I can't do anything" is a very idiotic excuse and kind of, possibly, lazy.
Don't delude yourself otherwise. The best thing you can do is either fade into obscurity or just learn to roll with what they say about you and learn to maybe laugh at yourself or look at yourself in a different light. The fact that you take yourself so seriously is what's causing you all this drama.
Honestly, you are the one being delusional. I've also just argued that your claim that "I can't do anything" is wrong by actually, I don't know, arguing, BASED off real things.
Seriously, what your suggesting isn't very open, at all honestly. I've known a better community who wouldn't be all naysayer like that I think.
Okay, dude, seriously, before you make a blog about "important issues" and try to change the world with it, learn how to actually use the English language properly. Your articles/blog posts are filled with so many incomprehensible sentences and grammatical errors that a 5th grader could point out. I really can't take anything you say seriously because you legitimately sounds like an idiot. I'm not even saying that to be mean. I'm saying it because I can't even understand the arguments you're making because some of your sentences are so grammatically incorrect that I can't pull any meaning out of them.
ReplyDeleteOr maybe you just don't plain understand?
DeleteLook, I'm not perfect at English, never said I was and to be honest, let me ask: What part do you not understand? Mind giving me examples?
Yet, I talked like this with some people before and they actually understood what I was saying.
Also, just because I spelled some things wrong, or somehow made no-sense with my sentences, doesn't mean I'm an "idiot" of the main ideas, or any idea. It just means I made some error while typing, if I did mainly.
Example A: "If the meaning has to mean that I'm an issue to there bigoted, pathetic, ignorant beliefs, then 'sure' I am."
Delete"The meaning has to mean?" What in the fucking world is the point of saying the same thing twice? Not only is it redundant, but I don't get what exactly you're trying to say by using the gerund form of the verb "to mean" and then using the verb "mean" within 4 words. Also, you consistently use the wrong form of "their" (you used "there," which means something totally different).
Example B: "The ones who call me that are just wanting to put people back to sleep and continue causing the real problems...
They may also be calling me an issue for saying that hurtful, hatred, etc. to be bad."
What in the world are you trying to say when you state: "[they are] wanting to put people back to sleep and continue causing real world problems?" Like seriously. You're trying to sound overdramatic and such, and you just sound like an idiot.
Example C: "Whatever your freedom says."
Literally a sentence fragment that doesn't mean a goddamn thing.
I could literally go on forever pointing out how you suck at writing and suck at making an argument.
#1
DeleteMaybe I screwed up on that first part, oh boy OOPSYDAYZY now my info is wrong, all wrong.. >_> Sorry, it's just the way you point this out isn't necessary, couldn't you at least not cuss and yell?? God... - Thanks anyway. >_>
#2
It's supposed to be based off an idea where "Media is sheep", or something. I said "The ones" as in the "Horse "News" people.
#3
Maybe I should've of said "Whatever your free will is". Is that better? >_>
Or maybe my mind is more about the "connecting puzzle" thing, where I am a huge fan of "meanings" and "symbols"... My mind is often about that you know, even though it can be very tricky to put out in solid words.
______
"I could literally go on forever pointing out how you suck at writing and suck at making an argument."
Maybe English is not my favorite language then.. Arguments? Give me a god damn break, I have asked for proof or arguments that would debunk ANY of my claims and they give me god damn nothing.
All they did was used bias nonsense against it. One guy might actually think that "popularity" is over "evidence" or "facts". THAT a sucky way to make an argument.
Look, MAYBE I'm not perfect at writing and even MLPCritic made an "twice" error like I did on that rotten article he made but that DOESN'T mean it debunks my main arguments.. There is a difference and if you still think I "suck" at making argument then you know how to fight them.. With real, god damn, evidence, and facts. Keep bias out of it.
asked for proof or arguments that could have a chance to debunk my claims* edited
DeleteTHATS a sucky way to make an argument.* edited
Had to do this because you probably will just bitch about a couple of errors I made.
-Thanks Google for not letting me edit my own comment!
I find these comments incredibly rude.
ReplyDeleteThen I remembered this was the internet, so it doesn't matter...can't we all just watch porn and cat videos in peace? Pwetty pwease?
The "this was the internet" phrase is getting old, really fast. It doesn't matter if it's the Internet or not. That's not important... That's like saying "THIS IZ THE INTERNET" over petitions against bills or something kind of.
DeleteIt's still an effect and the Internet is nothing but a communication tool and for data.