 |
| Note: This picture was uploaded after the main article was finished. |
Of course, the 24/7 stalker checks this wonderful truth seeking blog!
And of course will defend every single bigoted corrupted non-sense.
It's like he's a kid and likes to say every single word against him because he hates it. He can't stand the truth!
He's like a "No you!" kind of guy.
Of course, I accept this request though.
Here we go!
======================
Started at 8:14 PM (Or around 8:09 PM)
http://channeleven.deviantart.com/journal/Commentary-You-might-as-well-go-to-Tumblr-pt-1-569881716
And of course the other parts.
Man this guy loves to check my blog every day! This guy should go to prison for cyberbullying me every time I stand up for myself.
Note: Of course, within quote spacing: The deeper quote spacing is
his, the main quote spacing without the bold is mine and the bold
messages in the quote spacing is his again (But recent).
Note again: Some of my own quotes he posted within the quotes pacing may have some bold stuff too.
Also, the deeper quote spacing with bold words are most likely Peter's too.
So Jesse took two-three days to make a new response to my
commentary (and Funnel's commentary). Huh, I guess he wants to make it
look like he has a personal life. Also, I'll be trimming most of his
response so that way I could get it done faster.
Umm... actually it took 2-3 hours to make it.
The other time I was *ahem* outside of my room, doing stuff.
For a second, I thought the guy may have given up and took some lost advice..
Funny,
because I thought you finally learned to think about what caused all of
this and decided to leave the internet. Can't say I'm surprised that
you're still here.
I should be saying that to you.
You never were right no matter how much you believe.
But alas, the stalker still goes on (And meanwhile, some other
bigot attacks me for having a different opinion on Taboos.. I may get to
that some time later) with even more garbage. Pure garbage.
Ah yes, be sure to keep an eye out for a future commentary by Funnel. He's bound to own Jesse once more.
The person never "owned" me. Stop pretending that kid was always "right" when it's nothing but overly emotional garbage.
The more you keep acting like low emotional non-scientific opinions to be "right", the bigger the bigot you are.
Yes I been gone for a while.
"I've been jacking off to Alpha and Omega again."
Real mature.
Maybe you been jacking off to your disgusting heterosexual GF then... oh wait..
The request will be accepted.
You're still wwwarea....
*sigh* I'm ignoring this.
You don't have a better reason. Plus did I exactly say that (for your first part)?
It's implied throughout your commentaries. Why else would you defend every last fault you exhibit?
Your bigotry reasoning is why I defend my so-called "faults".
And they are not faults. Just because your bigotry mind said so, doesn't mean it is.
Again, it was never my fault for what you did and your shitty friends did.
"I didn't lash out at my critics, defend everything nor stalk them and my ED article, nosieree! I'm a special snowflake!"
But I have a right to argue them, I have a right to defend, (And I never stalked them, but they did) and that article is my business. Yet, you check my blog every 24/7.
And you don't know what a special snowflake is.
And umm some of the articles on the blog are mostly made by me.. I mean, under the requests via posted by the admin.
And who is the admin? You. You're the one man running the blog, no one else in their right mind would help you.
Actually you think the world is all about you REM. Face it, many people are not like you. I know plenty of people online is is far more smart than you, who is open, outside the "norm" and opens their mind more.
Face it REM, a lot of people are not like you.
Again, just because you think I did wrong, doesn't mean you are right.
You have no real moral sense. You do not respect opinions, you don't believe in individual freedom and other.
Right, because I have to respect everyone and everything and never criticize them.
Stop calling your bigotry and prejudice "criticism".
It's like saying homophobia speech is "criticism" and it's not.
Face it, you just can't get twisted beliefs out of your system.
And of course, you make an illusion claim that what you think is "right" just because you try to disguise it as "criticism".
Ironic
how you chew me out for making an "illusion claim" when you're also
guilty of doing the same thing with copyright. why the hell are you
entitled to claim something is fake, but when someone else does exactly
that, you go batshit insane?
Actually
'Intellectual Property' is proven to be an illusion.
I've seen the actual criticism, it shows our full history, the fact that we never needed Copyright (Just look at history), the purpose of Copyright, and the fact that Copyright is NOT a human right; that it was only a monopoly law granted for a LIMITED amount of time, then the Public Domain.
Criticism it's self isn't fake, but the problem is that you abuse that term, and use it over something as a disguised to call it "criticism". You have to realize that even if your garbage "was" criticism, doesn't mean you are all of a sudden "right".
Plus it's like calling homophobia or heterophobia "criticism" then.
That should apply to you buddy.
Really? I don't remember crying my eyes out when someone criticized a fetish.
And you always cry your eyes out when you see someone not you be themselves.
And cry your eyes out whenever someone criticizes you for your bigotry behavior toward them, and act like it was never your fault when you started a fight with those people.
All you do, is decide that other people's lives and etc. are "wrong" just becuase you want to.
Ok, so what you're saying is that I have to respect everyone's fetish?
OK*
Yes you do. You need to realize that not everyone is the same, that as long if they do not hurt anyone with their 'fetish', they are no better or worse than you with your type of sexuality.
If you respected personal opinion, you wouldn't attack them for coming out of the closet just because you don't like it, or what other people think around them.
I think it's morally fair to say that you are very wrong to dictate that someone's action is "wrong" just because you want to.
Then by your warped logic, it's wrong to cry when someone thinks differently.
That all depends buddy.
You are also comparing that with heterophobia who *thinks differently* than you.
If that's bad, then the same applies to people like you who bigotry attack people with alternative sexuality (I.e. Fetishes) that's part of their sexual identity.
And yeah, having let's say a 'foot fetish' for women is obviously part of heterosexuality for some heterosexual people.
It's clearly no different than deciding that homosexual is wrong (e.g. Based off what people thought of back then in 1700.
Because
man on man action is just like farting, vore, stomping and feet. Keep
his statement in mind, because he'll be referring to it a lot. In fact,
let's play a drinking game. Every time wwwarea cites homosexuality (or
heterosexuality) when defending certain fetishes, take a drink.
Just to show why you are a bigot.
It's the "same", it's already proven to have similarities, and they all don't hurt people it's self.
Also by the same, I'm talking about in comparison to sexual identity, that it's just another type of sexual style, etc.
Let's take a drink every time Peter said the word "criticism" then.
Not really. I know you accept the delusion that I "am" one from that other crazy sonic fan.
I
wouldn't say you're a goon, just seriously fucked in the head. Besides,
Funnel's a crazy Sonic fan (don't you mean sonicfag?)? I would bring up
past Sonicfags, but he'd probably defend them. Hell, he even ignores
PaulandAmy, who encompassed what wwwarea tries to shove down all our
throats.
Well I'm not fucked up either.
Yes I mean crazy Sonic fan (sonicfag doesn't exist, it's made up by butthurt trolls or cyberbullies like you).
If PaulandAmy harassed people then I'm not defending that, BUT people can forgive (like how people forgive mistakes) and defend around it on certain subjects that it's self isn't harassment.
The Internet?
Well buddy, their will always be "fetishes" and other interests you hate from people not you. This is the internet.
Yeah, and there'll be people who'll criticize and or exploit said fetishes.
And there will always be people to stand up for themselves against bigotry that you call "criticism" too.
There will always be racism somewhere on the Internet, etc.
Yet, things on the Internet can change. More and more people can speak up, form separated cultures and form better things in them.
And honestly, the Internet is not always right; that term is
nothing but a butthurt term it's self to whine at people's right to be
concerned.
Well it's a fact. This is the internet, and if you can't take the heat, just get lost.
Just because it's on the Internet, doesn't mean it's right.
So you DO believe every single thing on the Internet then.
Well, as an
internet user, you are a knuckles butthurt fag then.
You get lost. You are one of the slums that is making the Internet look worse.
And just because you get killed by some random murderer, not everyone will cry.
Over me not caring if someone knows my name? Drama queen. Again, the name Peter Vecchio is extremely common.
The same can kinda be said for me. Just because someone doesn't care about other people being attacked for being themselves doesn't mean it's "right".
(And I'm one of those who won't give a fucking shit about you).
Thx bby. ;D
Real mature.
And yet, people still have a right to be concern regardless whether some people care or not.
So you're saying that if someone's name is known on the internet, then they're forced to cry about it?
No, people who CARE has a right to be concerned and has a right to take action because it's their name.
If you stalk someone and find their personal information, then you are giving him the right to be concerned because you are "taking" a name not yours and that it belongs to him/her.
OTHER PEOPLE CARE, and that's who it's for, and the fact that it's still a concern.
Yeah, a minority of people who're so insecure that stuff like this causes more mental scarring than the Vietnam War.
Face it, popularity is not a valid argument.
Regardless of your bigotry beliefs, other people care. And the popular non-caring people cannot control it.
And cyberbullying is used to identify people like you.
So I'm a piece of fiction spun up by paranoid parents and teachers? Ok...
And wolfaboo is a fiction spuned up by butthurt furry haters and wolf haters then. And butthurt people who hates it when they hear the fact that humans are animals and that all animals are important equally.
Yet, cyberbullying is proven to be a real concern.. And what is wrong with parents caring about the safety and care for their children? If they make it up too, that counts.
Also, you don't know the definition right and yet, to show why
that term "wolfaboo" is just a *ahem* 'butthurt' term to whine about
freedom of expression.
It's actually a very accurate
term to describe you. Why else would you act so pissed when someone
criticizes what certain wolf fans think, and why do you get so defensive
over Alpha and Omega, all while failing to provide any reason why
anyone should give it a second look?
*drinks*
Actually it's not.
Being pissed off about hate that is arguable doesn't make me a wolfaboo.
Being defensive doesn't make me a wolfaboo.
I never failed at it, I already proved how they were biased.
Yet, if this makes me a "wolfaboo" (Again, if) then their isn't anything wrong with being one.
Just a 'butthurt' term to describe others for having a right to an opinion.
And you don't know their reasoning.
Isn't it obvious? Their love for wolves knows no bounds, to the point that it has taken over their lives.
It never took over their lives.
Plus, having wolves part of your personality and/or spirituality isn't the same as an unhealthy obsession.
You remind me of the sheep describe spiritual connecting people who are different than you.
And umm, no, their are different kinds of people more than that,
and you are not a true critic. But I can accept that you're just a troll
though.
Again, you are just making up stuff as if you were the official writers of the US dictionary.
Funny, since you treat your own delusional theories as fact.
The only delusional theories are yours.
Mine is based off real research, unlike yours.
Just stop with the idiotic crap, if you get to use that stupid
term "wolfaboo", then I have a right to make up terms too, just like
those words..
Fine by me, but wolfaboo is a true term, and you are one, whether you want to accept it or not.
And so is cyberbullying.
Whether you want to accept it or not.
You know?
Cyberbullying is on the real dictionary, a real legal law, etc.
Wolfaboo isn't and is only made up by some minority from 4chan.
Seeing this comparison makes me laugh at how insane you are.
You said something about me being a "cyberbully" then said that..
From now, you are just not making sense anymore.
Holy shit... I corrected him on an oversight, and he defended it... You just can't deal with being wrong, can you?
I didn't defend myself as a "cyberbully".
Did YOU read it right?
Again, you claim it doesn't exist, but then you call me one?
Stop telling people what is "normal" and "not".
The
Internet is based off expression from offline and the Internet is a
tool to gather new experience to gather new experiences in RL.
Not everyone is the same way.
And not everyone is like you.
Thanks for admitting that think your way of life is "better" just because you think alternatives are "weird".
Bigot.
Also, you don't know my life. And stop pretending you do.
It's
reflected in your online activity. The internet is based off expression
from one's offline life. You said so yourself, and through your
behavior, I could interpret that you hardly go out and that you likely
live in a group home.
That's still assumption buddy.
I never tell everything, I mean every single expression given is based off offline, and learned from other parts online.
But that doesn't mean every information based off RL is given out.
Hell, thanks to the Internet, I became a better person.
Better to yourself, but to others, you're just a lolcow who provides more than enough milk.
No I became better, but the more I become better, people like you don't like it.
Just like how people accepted homosexual and some other sexual rights, phobia people will get upset and consider the freedom supporters a 'weird term' like 'lolcow'.
I used to be like you, who bashes people who expresses themselves
when I was a little kid, etc.. then I learned about the expressions of
other people, etc. and I no longer am that guy.
You've gone from a nice person with some common sense to an absolute waste of flesh. Outstanding.
Thanks for admitting to be a bigot once more.
Just grow up.
Show them my History article then. Just that.
They'd laugh at your ineptitude.
Just do it.
What a bad cousin then. I wonder if he's like 15? I wonder if he's learning from you to make him look "cool" in your eyes?
She's in her twenties, she's in a relationship, she is a lot nicer and far more successful than you'll ever hope to achieve.
If she for once have used "lolcow" then she is not going to be a nice person most likely.
But of course, you think she is because your bigotry twisted mind accepts it.
Yet. I still wait for you to show her that article..
I go outside too.
[link]
Very mature.
Hey, it's true. It's clear that you never leave your room.
Then I will decide that you secretly went into a gay porn place as a heterosexual because I said so.
It's not called "obsessed", I control it, and take it has more of a heart content, promotes careers, etc.
You can't go one day without complaining about me and you stalk your ED article constantly. That's being obsessed.
That sounds like you.
And yeah, I am obsessed with me as an existing person with rights, to complain about something so bullshit with me.
No it's not obsessed, it's called not giving up and standing up (with your heart) for myself and possibly others.
Plus, you are obsessed with me, of a guy who defends things that are not even effecting your life, stalk me every single day, (I don't do that every day actually) and twist up meanings to support your selfish bigoted mind.
Thanks the the Internet and what I love doing, I learned so much. I
now know how to draw a lot more, I can model, I can learn how to use a
computer more than you, I know a lot more.
Your drawings
are worse than Chris Chan's and not as comical as chasethehedgehog's,
your modeling is primitive and knowing more? Please.
No they aren't.
Plus, you take bad "photography", who can't draw, model, or even fucking know how to take a in-PC snapshot.
You can't even properly make stamps either. Or even use an existing one.
Your skills are god awful.
All you do is take a bunch of snapshots of random things (Including people's property that isn't yours) because taking snapshots is very easy to you and use that as a "major" skill.
For me, I am far less lazy than you, I work a lot more.
It's almost like I am the camera doing all the work.
I also became aware of so much criticism questioning our overly emotional tabooing, etc.
Probably from someone with as much mental problems as you.
Judging by how scientific the article is, how much it makes sense, and documents society, and their overly emotional behavior, that's not the case. And I don't have mental problems (but you do though).
This is a photo I took on my iPhone.
At least it's very rare that you come up with at least half a decent work.
During another time, you take pictures of your feet, a crushed water bottle, someone's crushed car that isn't yours, and other.
Yet, while nature and your camera did all the work in that snapshot, can you even Photoshop it.. at least?
Again folks, Victim blaming.
Your buzzword of the day.
Scientifically, you are blaming a person who never started a fight with anyone because the person never mentioned anyone's personal freedom in a bad way..
And when the trolls start a fight (Who first directly mentioned the person, and attacked the person because they didn't like what the guy in his rightful speech said), you blame a guy who didn't start anything with the trolls instead of blaming the trolls who had the choice to not attack the person..
You started it buddy, you made me rage, and the cause of that is you.
You could've been more mature, but you instead made yourself look worse.
"If he talks in ways I don't like, I will start a fight and blame him for it."
You started it and stop depending on the bullies who bully me.
You're a grown man, crying over bullies. It's clear that you're not right in the had.
A grown man has a right to take action against bullies and cyberbullying.
You do realize your crap can easily be compared to those who blame
homosexuals in the darker ages for standing up for themselves right?
"Homosexuals gave more bigots a reason to go after them"/"you'd give people more of a reason to go after you"
Take a drink.
This is why I prefer an actual person who knows how to debate.
How do you know? Lot's of the times I try to avoid you accept when
I need to see if you been making more crap about me.. And for example, I
didn't check your profile in about 2-3 days recently.
Wow, 2-3 days. That's gotta be a record. Did you spend those days in a fetal position?
At least it's way better than your every single day stalking.
Yet, I track what makes it my OWN BUSINESS. That's not the same as 'stalking'.
Uh, yes it is. Whether or not it applies to you, it's still stalking.
Just because you believe it is, doesn't mean it is. Justice exist, defending is different.
Maybe I'll ask an online lawyer, but I'm sure victims have a right to be concerned with stuff that is directed at them.
I believe a victim has a right to be concerned about their own self being stalked.
If a victim stalks, they loose their victim credibility. Not that you ever had it to begin with.
Umm but it's not stalking. In order to get that information, they would have to find the cyberstalker and gather the information. That's how it works.
And I am a victim.
First of all, you do realize you don't know me right? Your assumptions are never perfect.
Your actions prove otherwise. I could determine how you act through your actions online.
No you can't.
If I had to, then I will say the same to you then.
And two: You clearly should realize that not everyone is like you right?
Do you realize that not everyone is like you?
Yes, I know they have different sexual identities, different movies, shows, etc
The problem with you is that you expect them to be like you.
All I'm doing is defending freedom of expression and defending myself.
The only damaged mind is you.
And those people who has 'fetishes' count.
Not really.
For all we know, they don't actually like you, and if you didn't defend
their fetishes, they would've left your sorry ass long ago. Doesn't
help that you drove away your only friend because he started to disagree
with you (much like how Chris Chan drove away his only true friend)
Yes really. It's clearly proven how.
You don't know that, plus everyone is friends for every reason. When you accept yourself, you will start to accept others and if you defend other stuff, they will also use a similar thing and gain ideas to understand why you are just a sick and disgusting cyberbully. They are still free to accept me for their own personal needs (That's what everyone is), and they all have a valid reason to defend..
What friend? LMJ?
I barely knew him. I have many friends, after figuring out that he's just a nut job like you (Who don't respect opinions at all and dictates), then I won't be his friend and for good reason.
Maybe you don't count for having your SHITTY COMMON fetishes then.
Some people are aware of me, and they know that most of everything wasn't even wrong, and forgive a couple of certain mistakes.
Maybe you sugarcoated everything that happened in an attempt to get sympathy.
Tsk tsk tsk Peter, how bigoted can you get?
Yet, one of the really sad things is that not only you did a shit ton of mistakes, but you actually defend them.
Actually a lot of people would laugh at your horrid crap.
As in, laugh with me as they observe you in their full glory.
Only with similar 4chan faggots like you.
I was told by better and more open people that nobody likes the site.
And meanwhile some other people said it's meant to be a joke site, even some people who use it.
If they figure out that you were serious and not joking about me to laugh at, then more people would hate you.
Plus, just because it's considered that doesn't mean it's no longer an attack site.
"My skin is too thin to just ignore a site like that."
If you are serious, to mock me for things you think is "wrong", then it's an attack article.
As a victim of the article, I have a right to say that.
Calling someone out for using his constitutional rights of speech
that isn't prejudice and bigotry toward people's likes is called an
"attack". Just because you think I did "wrong" doesn't mean it's no
longer an attack.
You've abused the first amendment so
many times it filed a restraining order. What happens if me and my
friends relied on the first amendment? You'd still go apeshit. Also,
just because the first amendment gives you freedom of speech, that
doesn't mean there aren't limits.
No I didn't. Just because you claim I "abused" it doesn't mean I did.
The problem is that you call me a bad person for using my first amendment to argue why your behavior is wrong.
Actually some speech isn't constitutional. The government and sites don't even allow certain speech because certain speech has hurt and damaged other people.
Yet, even if you have a right to free speech for your bigotry about other people, people are ALSO allowed to use freedom of speech to call you out for that, which then you say they are "bad" people for.
Face it buddy, your twisted beliefs about ME (my business) isn't
fact. You acting like someone is bad because you think it's bad with no
real moral value, is an actual problem.
No, through you
crying that people don't agree with you, trying to make everyone
respect fetishes, that movie you obsess over and other stuff, it's clear
that you're not a good person.
Umm yes it is.
though* If people don't agree, other people can not agree back.
Not respecting fetishes shows that you are a bigoted and bad person who don't respect Freedom of Expression.. which by the way, is another right. Which you don't respect.
I am not a bad person for being so-called "obsessed" with that "movie". You don't have a right to dictate that over people's lives not you.
But I'm not a bigot, I have real experience, real reasoning, and
the fact that bringing you out for attacking privacy rights (for
example) isn't the same as a real bigot.
You treat your views as fact, and you refuse to let people think differently than you. That's being a bigot.
Umm no it's not. Plus don't you do the same thing for the first part?
Again, that depends.
You don't even respect actual freedom to privacy, that makes you a bigot.
If you can't respect fetishes, you are not respecting personal opinion.
If you can't respect privacy rights, you are not respecting personal opinion.
If you can't respect the criticism toward you for bringing out stuff you do to other people not you, then you are not respecting opinion.
Some views are proper and correct.
Not really.
"Because I said so"
I guess also, the view that harming others is "OK" is 'Not really' proper and correct then according to your claim.
Me showing that you attack people for harmless consenting things is a reasonable thing.
Don't you mean crying your eyes out because I damaged your ego?
So freedom of consent and human/animal rights is an "ego" now?
The only ego is yours. Clearly.
And I guess according to your bigotry definition, people are "ego" for bringing out a murderer then.
"It's his fault that I and trolls bullied him!!!!!"
That's "good" old REM.
A 21 year old man continuing to showcase his thin skin? Classic wwwarea.
"I love being an ageist and love to blame someone instead of my own actions."
Really no different than this:
"It's the homosexuals fault for being bullied for being a homosexual!"
Take a drink.
A 20 year old man who just can't debate.
No buddy, you shouldn't of tried to link that.
And I can't all the way hide it.You still try to stalk me.
Maybe because you didn't try hard enough, if at all, to privatize most of your information?
Again, you shouldn't of attempt to link my Facebook account. It doesn't matter what the owner tried to do.
Again, you never found my real FB.
Oh, just grow up already. If I didn't find your "real" Facebook, why did the one linked in your ED article go down?
What are you talking about? When I first saw it, it gave me a broken link.
Yet, even if it wasn't broken before, it could of been a coincidence.
If you used your head, you would try to not link it.
Right, because now tears will stream from your eyes forever.
Again, more immature cyberbullying.
Plus, it's still a problem due to RL people possibly finding it through that horrid article and if they ever found that garbage.
"Then people will criticize me which will drive me to suicide! BAAAAAWWW!"
*drinks*
And if I commit suicide, it will be your fault.
And again, stop calling your garbage criticism, and lot's of people can have corrupted beliefs on some subjects.
1. That's a general account area. That's different.
2.
The fact that you always monitor my other accounts, link them, and THEN
post a non-general Facebook (A RL person focus type) makes it
different.
Nice to see a good generalization flew right over his head. But what if that account had absolutely nothing on it? Hell, you left a link to my Facebook account in one of your responses, and I'm not crying over it.
It's still the same thing. You are trying to attempt to link to my facebook along with the rest of the stalking. How you just try to find me deeper, your reasoning behind it, etc.
And again, you are not me.
Other people (not you, remember that) has a right to be concerned.
Yet, you actually monitor me every 24/7.
You were arguing that if something is on 'public' then it's "OK" to post it on the Internet in other places.
Again, still no excuse for you to try to find that profile.
I
get it now, you're too brain dead to edit something, and rather than
learn from such an error, you continue to blame everyone for your own
faults. I'll bet that you'd attack your sister for posting a link to her
Facebook profile on her YouTube page.
What "error"? And they are to blame, since you can't seem to realize that it's their fault for choosing to do shit to people for being themselves.
No, I would just kindly ask her to delete it. If she was a stalker, a horrible cyberbully, and other bad things like you, then I would be a bit more angry.
My criticism involves people who bigotry and prejudice attack
other people's likes (NOT respecting) for their "superior" claiming
opinions.
I'm not being an asshole, I'm bringing out an asshole, like you though.
Hard not to see the irony in his statement.
Just admit it.
Actually keep guessing buddy. In fact, an average parent who sees
that would think your just a troll, and probably say to ignore him, and
may help with legal action of the harassment you do and advocate.
Yet
knowing you, all you'd do is continue to let yourself get bothered by
me. If you brought a lawyer into this, he'd probably laugh.
Because you keep bothering me, you let me think that, and you keep making it worse.
Nah he wouldn't. I would also tell him about your mistake on that whole link to an illegal porn site probably.
If you can't respect all harmless furries, those who defend
consenting things, has different beliefs, etc, etc. for your beliefs,
then you don't deserve respect.
Not all furries are harmless, especially by your brainless standards.
When I said harmless furries, I'm talking about certain furries (harmless type) and guess what? Them applying 'fetishes'/alternative sexuality to their art isn't harmful, fursuit sex isn't harmful, wearing fursuits in public isn't hamrful, and other, etc.
And no, just because it's possible that certain harmless furries can harm someone (Just like how it's possible for a person like you with a common fetish to possibly harm someone with it) doesn't mean they are harmful automatically.
No, according to the definition of it, it's about bringing out real legit faults.
Though it doesn't always have to be nice.
Criticism it's self isn't meant to be positive support I think, but my point is that a fair negative criticism is meant to bring out real actual faults that are actually a moral problem. Not some person with a fursuit in public.
Also, the art style is not crappy, just because you have a belief about
it, doesn't mean your "criticism" is "fair". Face it, your reasoning to
dictate other people's intentional style isn't fair. Critique is about
IMPROVING something that EXISTS. And guess what? The 'art-style' exist;
it's made out of purposes.
Treating your opinion as a fact again, eh?
But it's 'not' an opinion, it's a fact.
Yet, you treat your opinion as "fact" over someone's art style that ISN'T YOURS.
Yet, I heard that an opinion can be better than the other with more evidence, etc.
Maybe I'll just judge that your shitty OC has a crappy art style then.
Uh... what OC?
K, sorry, I mean your knuckles.
I am showing fair criticism and a lot of people actually listens.
Yeah, like one or two people.
More like 99 people at least:
http://wwwarea.deviantart.com/art/Respecting-Opinions-Ehh-I-Won-t-Respect-Hate-520067789
That's just the favorites, their is also guests, and other members.
And the views of this subject is just increasing it's views.
Just like common heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, transgender, and other.
Take a drink.
Immature.
Anyway it's true. People of those has records of rape moments and other sexual violence much more than someone having a 'foot fetish' for example.
The least risky is an asexual.
"Cuz I saids so!"
Face it Peter, you can't take ANY real criticism.
When I argue, I try to debate, when you argue, you can't handle a real debate.
The reason why I said asexual being less risky is because it's about avoiding sex.
Meaning little or no risk of raping others, and little to no sexual violence.
Because an Asexual avoids sexuality.
In the end, just because you FEAR something would happen, doesn't mean it's OK to attack something based off fear of the future.
Fear is never an answer.
You'd probably wait until the crime is done with before you take action. you could never be too careful.
Just like with any person of anything then.
Buddy, the real crime is when the crime commits, that's the main point.
Bashing someone when someone can possibly NOT do the crime, is unfair.
And shows that you are still guilty.
You can control a 'fetish' just like anything.
Not everyone could.
So just because certain people failed to control it, that means it's OK to attack everyone who CAN control it that has the same fetish?
The fuck?
God what is with you with your bullshit reasoning?
Can't be anymore bullshit than your views.
And how is mine "bullshit"?
I also like how you admit that yours is bullshit though.
You wish. But regardless, I am a person that counts. So if I find it disturbing, then it's wrong then.
Fairly compared to your reasoning.
You heard him folks he thinks that his views are true because he thinks so. Stroke that ego.
That's what you do first. And I'm just arguing like a debater, that's the point when someone debates with someone with comparing, arguing, etc.
Face it, if others find someone "disturbing", then the same can be said to you back.
You dictate that I don't count, I have a right to bring out your bigotry of that and show that you are not me.
You are the bigot, not me.
I only don't respect the types of 'opinions' that ALREADY doesn't respect them in the first place.
I kinda do the same thing, yet it's too much for you.
You attack lot's of furries, lot's of people with different sexuality than you, attack people who gives feedback about a company, etc.
The people you mention are not attacking 'opinion' in the first place. But you on the other hand who brings them out as "bad" people, and other harmful stuff...
Anyway, be bringing out an asshole like you who attack those
either out of 'fear', 'popularity', or your own sacred personality isn't
the same.
Kinda is, since you can't bear for your views to be questioned.
No it's not, it's called justice. It's OK to attack someone for robbing a bank in order for them to stop.
You can't take any criticism buddy.
Yes I could, but you can't.
No you don't. You can't take mine, and whine about me saying that I should 'shut up', whine that I can't take your so-called "criticism" as if your "criticism" was "always right" when it's not, etc.
And my criticism is justice, because treating your personal
opinion as "fact" in the FIRST place, is a fault. Hell, I didn't even
say what you personally like is a flaw in a serious manner.
The way normal people see it, justice = crying.
More like abnormal people. Though what is "normal"?
And I guess you don't believe in justice. Not surprised.
But they are to blame. They legitimately started it.
"Right after I acted poorly in the face of criticism, but because I think so, I'm never wrong!"
*Drinks*
Face it, your shit isn't fair criticism or even criticism. Sometimes your "criticism" can be wrong and that the one who opposes it can be right.
Sometimes I am right.
And the stuff I "make" up is a fact. Because it's true, they had the choice to follow the Golden Rule, but they didn't.
True because you think so, god forbid someone thinks otherwise.
As a debater who argues, that's kinda the point, and what I think has evidence, observation, etc.
You just make stuff up out of your own head and treat others like crap because you want to.
Morally, they started to attack me because of their bigotry beliefs about others.
No, they criticized you because you were acting like a complete moron.
*Drinks*
More like whenever they get criticized for their bigotry beliefs that they think is "criticism", they whine about it and makes things worse. All because somebody couldn't stand people with fetishes.
Sorry but that really depends.. Plus, if they attack others with
their discrimination, then it's fair to "attack" others with Free speech
to defend others.
Defending is justice.
So by your logic, the stuff me and my friends say against your delusional views is protected by the first amendment.
Again "free" speech depends. But if you get to say hurtful things about others, then people can use their free speech to show how morally bigoted you are.
Proof please? Give me examples that I "don't".
It's all shown in your responses, plus Jared has evidence.
Oh you mean that I compared the fact that if someone can be a dick to 'fetishes', then the same can be said for heterosexuality?
Face it, if it's guilty, then you are guilty for being a 'fetishphobia' then.
Yes, it's a real term based off the two different words: "fetish" and "fear".
First of all, it's not exactly like Romeo and Juliet, especially since it's wolves, not whatever that was.
That's like saying recolors aren't recolors because they have a different color palette.
Umm no. That's not the same thing.
Kinda is, since it's essentially Romeo and Juliet replaced by ill-portrayed wolves.
'Kinda'? But as a whole, it's not. Especially since it's not just wolf replacing by cool-portrayed wolves (Since you put your personal opinion as fact again, I will put mine back then), some parts are different.
But it's not surprising of you to say that since you didn't even watch the movie and listened blindly to some bias critics.
Yet, if it's the same, then everything is the same.
Right, because god forbid people criticize the one movie you furiously masturbate to.
That's why I make anti-heterosexual jokes solely against people like you who can't respect those who actually do that.
Plus, why pick an off-topic thing? And yet, that 'criticism' can be argued as wrong.
But alas, you don't believe that people can use Freedom of Speech to disagree.
Honestly, wwwarea should simply move to Tumblr.
Actually, you should.
At least go back to 4chan.
---
PART 2
But that is fair. You whine about others who shows it's purpose, and
then dictate and whine about something you didn't even watch.
And solely your reasoning is to force that censorship down other people's throats.
Justifying an obvious fault. Classic wwwarea.
"Because I said so" <Like everything else you do REM.
Umm no it's not. Respecting it doesn't mean you have to like it. You can
dislike something but respect the artist who expresses what you don't
like for others who do like it.
Right, we don't want to hurt the artist's little feelings.
Well doing that makes you an asshole and a self righteous egoist person who thinks you can dictate other people not you.
Well, you already are that person, but it does so even more.
Also, the reason why I say purposes are not flaws because that's a fair
legit argument; it's not fair to dictate someone's art style that isn't
yours.
Isn't that treating personal opinion as "fact"? Putting your
mind over other people's creative intentions because you don't like it?
Or you depend on other personal opinions?
Just because it fulfills a certain purpose, that doesn't always mean it's good
"Because I don't like it"
Sorry buddy, but you are treating your personal opinion as fact by using that as an argument.
Exposed... as usual.
Keep saying that, but it's only true in your own little world.
Aka, the real world.
Aka, the real dream world of yours.
But here is an example of what counts as "personal opinion as fact"
Claiming the art-style is a "flaw" because you said so.
Claiming the movie "sucks" because you don't like the inspired story.
Claiming that something must be this or that (while ignoring the intentions of a work that ISN'T YOURS) is a "flaw" or "not".
This translates to "Criticizing an art style I pleasure myself to and the movie itself makes me sad!"
Sorry but your "criticism" isn't even right.
Yet, you are still treating your personal opinion as "criticism". I still stand obviously.
Yet you treat your personal opinion as fact.
I'm not treating a personal opinion as "fact", I'm just exposing that you shouldn't treat your personal opinion as "fact".
I'm just making a natural global debate regardless of what I like or hate in a personal way (e.g. Whether I like the art style of something or not).
It's called debating.
You on the other hand, actually do that.
Again, you don't know that and second, stop depending on popularity.
Not all anthropomorphic fans will like all anthropomorphic styles but there exist different subs of genres for the right people.
Yet, anthropomorphism has no rules on how you could make it.
Still doesn't mean you shouldn't try.
Still doesn't mean that I should.
It's a free right, so it's not a flaw to go for a certain audiences.
It's proven that trying to gain more audiences globally will stifle creativity.
You couldn't even argue how that was "true".
I don't have to. Your stupidity proves it for me.
Umm yes you do.
Plus, how is it "stupid"?
If it's not real, then RL bullying isn't real either.
A definition only exists because people took it too seriously.
No it exist because it exists, it's everywhere on the Internet, their are parts similar to bullying in RL, etc.
It's even accepted by the law and you still believe it doesn't exist.
It's like saying "murder doesn't exist" even though people kill people.
wwwarea.deviantart.com/art/Imz…
No. They are basically a better source of information than your horrid "theories".
Because your crap promotes harm on other people, abuse others online, etc.
Can't be any worse than the shit you gear out.
Actually my "shit" is fair criticism.
For example: It's not shit to say and remind people that people have a right to be themselves.
Face it REM, you had no excuse to harass someone, especially to the
point of suicidal thoughts. Fear is NOT a legit reason to punish
someone.
When it comes to stuff like this, sometimes you have to assume the worst.
Face it, you are just biased and picking crap up out of whatever twisted belief you have.
It's not an excuse because it doesn't hurt anyone, and fear will never be an answer.
Again, he's right only in his fantasy bigotry world.
Ironically, it applies to you more.
Keep dreaming.
You do realize that you don't know that right?
PLUS, the message was in a PRIVATE note. And someone leaked it according to what it looks like.
Nobody knows for sure, but don't act like you would know.
But what if it's true? Eh, who am I kidding, even if it's 100% proven to be real, you wouldn't even care.
Yet, funny of you to say that, yet you pretend you know everything about my life.
Look buddy, I came from a world where law is meant to go after people
who COMMITTED the crime, not because it is risky that they COULD commit
it.
Plus, parents have the legal right to take kids away from them at any time.
But your advocating harassment, isn't.
Something tells me you would wait until someone gets shot to death before you bother calling the cops.
Threats are different too. A threat is more of a knowing thing, a fear isn't.
Yet, regardless of fear, it's still illegal to force someone to commit suicide.
No, this applies to all of them.
Not from what I've heard (from you)
You still can't figure out that the thing I said earlier was an example still.
My point is that it's higher for the common stuff than someone with vore, feet, etc..
Sounds more like an opinion than a fact.
Actually this "opinion" is a fact. All you have to do is look at the history, and observe yourself.
Yet, some opinions can have more evidence than the other.
Guess what buddy? It's wrong to attack and treat people like crap for
having a different opinion for you involving freedom rights.
Stop blaming the wrong people.
You do that all the time, and you've yet to catch in to the fact that maybe you're at fault.
Freedom to attack Freedom? That's considered 'Too much freedom'.
So it's not my fault. Because defending is not a fault.
Unless I defend things that violates freedom of expression or real rights.
Your friend caused it, plus it's off topic, still showing you caused it with me.
Yeah, my friend posted a stamp which you happened to spam. He's totally at fault.
I don't think I spammed it. I disagreed with it.
Yet, that's a really off-topic thing. A person doing this crap today is a new start of something all over again.
Because they stalk me, (And my action isn't really stalking).
My article is about me, so I have a right to look at it.
Again, victim blaming.
Again, an immature made up term "lolcow".
Again,
this is the internet, and for someone who continues to produce
reactions on a grand scale when criticized, you're definitely an epic
lolcow.
*drinks*
Stop it with the "thiz is thez internzetsz" it's not an excuse, and just because it's the 'Internet' doesn't mean it's right.
Again, not criticism, just bigotry, and of course you used an immature word.
A lot of smart people wouldn't use that word.
Being concerned about stalking and making journals that defend the victim =/= same. It's called justice.
Yet in the real world, justice is really stalking.
Face it, in the actual real world, it's called justice.
No, in your magical pretend world, it's justice, but in the real world, it's called stalking.
No, it's justice. Calling the police from stalkers (And in order to do that, you have to gain proof (I.e. Discover the activity) is justice for example.
No. You monitor me, and other people first. I barely do that accept for the right to be concerned about content aimed at me.
Again, victim blaming folks.
And of course, his type of "criticism" found only in the dictionary made by Peter.
Again, wwwarea blaming everyone but himself.
Because I didn't start all of it.
Actually these 'shiny wolves' are from people around the real world, including the legal websites.
So you only rely on your delusional imagination for guidance?
So you act like you know everything but you don't?
Yet, you couldn't even understand the figure of speech.
The stuff I quote from are from the real legal areas, and many other definitions.
You just can't stand it when someone exposes you as a real cyberbully.
It's like if you ever murdered someone and someone exposes, you would probably say "Murder doesn't exist!".
If you and your friends leave me alone, then I will ignore them.
Own up to your mistakes, and we'll leave you be.
"What area did was a mistake because I said so!"
Face it, if you and your friends choose to leave me alone with my life, then I would leave you alone back.
Face it, you can't take real criticism.
By your definition, criticism is listening to you and acting/thinking like you.
Then criticism doesn't exist then.
Again, it's criticism. Criticism is about bringing out actual faults and you did a shit ton of faults out of delusional unproven beliefs.
The law: "It exist" You: "Umm no it doesn't."
Face it, it exist. It's real, and the only ones who would say that it doesn't exist are cyberbullies like you.
Nice to see you're forcing your views once more.
And you are obviously no different.
But in debating, that's what it means in a way, and since you are in a "debate", I can argue you back and I'm pretty sure you are the one that's wrong.
Again, more bigotry and prejudice crap.
Can't seem to experience others on how they live life.
Actually, I just don't like it when people spend their whole lives on the computer.
"I will dictate other people's lives as bad because I don't like it!"
You are the record to bring examples of bigotry.
You also caused people to harass me too.
Those
people actually think properly, and they only wish to help you
improve yourself, but instead, you just ignore it entirely and make
yourself look worse and worse by the day.
No they don't. They have been proven wrong several of times.
Gud1
It's true. Face it.
So... you admit to sharing a link to a comment containing an illegal link to a CP site?
Also, you don't have the legal authority to just share that stuff in public like that. In fact, nobody does.
If you want to help cops find people like that, you have to do it right.
Not fucking share links to the FUCKING PUBLIC.
As
I keep telling you, I made it clear that the guy originally posted the
link. But, I took it down It's clear how you'd do anything to get rid of
me.
But you posed a link on a journal
leading to the area of the other guy posting the link. I mean did you do that?
And after, you updated it by taking it down?
I mean, is that what you did.
If you are talking about a comment linking to yet another comment linking to another site.
Then what about that journal you made BEFORE you updated it?
You made it look like I was a child predator, something that I've never done to you.
And I can't believe DA didn't even take action when I reported that journal.
dA was smart for once.
So they were "smart" to leave a journal open with a link leading to an area that I think tried to promote an illegal porn site?
Gud1
Oh yeah? Did you leave it up before he hid it?
I don't know what you're talking about, but the link was removed when he hid the comment.
Yeah but I wonder if you left it during the time he had it up?
Face it buddy, it's not real criticism. Yet, even if it was, that doesn't automatically mean it's "right".
Criticism that harms your ego is not real criticism? Ok...
*Drinks*
Just because you call it an "ego" doesn't mean it is.
You are bringing freedom rights out and defenders who defend freedom as a "problem" when in reality, it's not.
Again, not fair criticism or hell, even criticism at all. Only shitty
people like you laugh, and of course, a 'joke' is not the same as
'funny'. Joking is about not acting serious.
You could of moved on and not made the article and/or update it.
A smart person would learn to laugh at himself, and not get all defensive for no reason.
That really depends buddy.
I won't laugh at myself for doing things that wasn't even wrong.
And I am defensive for actual reasons. You can't dictate that I had "no" reason.
First of all, you don't know reality fully, nobody does. They have a
right to their beliefs. Two, stop fear basing. Three, just because it's
'unappealing' to many individuals, doesn't mean it's wrong. STOP
depending on what other people think.
Why don't you stop depending on yourself for info
That's not how it works. You don't have a right to depend on yourself over OTHERS not you.
You can't do that.
People have a right to consider stuff very important, and you can't stop that.
Forth, in other words, you attack people who disagree with you. You attack people who call you out as wrong.
No, not at all.
Judging by your history. That's bullshit.
Of course, you will have so much delusion to think that none of them are "attacks".
You don't get it. You fear that a fursuit will do something bad or
something you think is "bad", and think it's "OK" to attack them for
that.
Since it's fear based, I compared it to something else.
The person could believe they are what they wear. It'd be due to certain mental issues.
If they want to believe that in spirit, then they have a right to believe that.
It's not harmful to have that belief it's self and you can't dictate that it is just because of your bigotry mind.
And no, you don't know spirituality so you have no right to call them "delusional" as if you know everything.
And it's not mental issues.
Yet, it's their body not yours, it's their mind not yours. You don't have rights to attack them out of fear.
I don't treat my personal opinion as superior or fact over people not me. Though, you however do.
Funny, since you do that all the freakin' time.
No I don't. Considering you don't know what a 'personal' opinion is.
Even people on YOUR side agreed with me that posting that was a mistake.
Any proof?
It's hard to remember where I got the comments on. But hey, I donzts neefdz proofz. Look yourself.
No. They are just personal opinions, which isn't fact. If you say it's
"bad" or "closer" BECAUSE of those personal opinions, then guess what?
You treat personal opinion as "fact".
Well unfortunately for you, A&O being mediocre is closer to a fact.
As always, you treat your personal opinion as "fact" or other people's personal opinion as "fact".
Also, the movie is remembered a lot by others.
Yeah, wolfaboos.
Nope. Yet, everyone counts. Stop pretending they are special and not the same as other people.
And stop depending on who.
It's remembered by lot's of
people, get over it.
Also, as for my claim, I depend on a legit critique about quality. Which
is considered to be away from 'personal'. And accepting purpose is a
main point of critiquing something.
Or in your case, being nice to the art style and not being critical.
That's the point though, you can't bring out an intentional style.
Otherwise doing that is biased.
The only time you "can" is when it wasn't intention and the artist was trying to aim for another style instead.
Again, a guy will call all his cyberbullying "criticism".
Face
it, you have to realize that not everything you do is "criticism" and
even if it "was", it's immature cyberbullying "criticism". Because words
can sometimes be connected.
"I'm too fragile to handle criticism, and I'm too much of a moron to turn off my computer!"
Again, can't argue.
What's this? You agree that you're unable to turn off the computer and you can't handle criticism?
*Drinks*
"Why can't people not me be like me?!"
And yet, I go out sometimes.
Just because I said you violated the rules, doesn't mean it connects to
my joy that he you got suspended. I believe you are separating
something.
Hell, I don't even fully know that I got you suspended.
So why make a statement that implied you were at fault?
Fault? More like a good reason.
And because that was a separated thing.
Remember, I also said your friends made mistakes for breaking the rules too.
I also say that to your cyberbullying friends
who also violated it the rules and they didn't even get suspended (At
least to the recent people I was dealing with).
dA is pretty inconsistent with their rules.
Face it. You can't even stand the justice actions from the admins.
The admins don't know any better. They can't do their jobs properly.
Face it, you just can't stand that they did the right thing.
Your cyberbullying posts don't belong here and it makes DA a worse place.
Actually you did that to me. All I did was simply express a personal
belief in no different manner than those who believe in a God.
Then you directly attacked me first.
Whatever makes you feel special....
The same for you for whatever spiritual belief or religion you have then.
Again, I never attacked anyone for my spiritual beliefs, unlike you.
And your belief that I am "delusional" doesn't have it either.
Plus,
you can't criticize something like that. You don't have a right to force
your unproven "criticism" on people for their personal beliefs.
Well neither do you then.
You clearly don't get it.
Saying "I believe this" =/= forcing.
But calling someone "delusional" = forcing.
And no, me expressing myself (Like that one journal with the word "otherkin" and "wondering" isn't forcing.
Unless you preach your shit and cry when nobody takes you seriously.
Preaching isn't forcing.
Yet, the way they reacted to me wasn't respectful.
No different when a rabid atheist goes to someone's page and say "God doesn't exist! Hahaha"
or "You are delusional arguing for a God!"
One, I never said heterosexuality was "delusional" and two, that depends.
You've preached that it was more harmful than fetishes.
No I was saying it was more RISKY than them. Because you claim fetishes were "risky" then I remembered the time with all the rape reports based off intercourse, in comparison to having a basic 'fetish' like feet, vore, and some others.
And people have a right to criticize "back".
Yet the way you do it is pretty immature.
Nah, not really.
Yet, there is some evidence for spiritual stuff you know.
Probably from some biased source.
Not really. And recently I've found another article that proves the illusion theory about this world involving an experiment used by scientists to further prove the theory.
Oh great, another guy you hate because you hate him when he stands up for himself?
Or because I "cause" similar reactions by trolls?
Very pathetic.
That's
right folks. wwwarea defended Elliot Rodger. A killer who murdered
many people because he couldn't get a girlfriend. It's gonna happen,
wwwarea will become the next Elliot Rodger.
Look REM, I didn't know who that guy was and I just assumed you were talking about the usual drama. So now that I know, why the FUCK did you compare me to that guy?
I do not whine people for not liking the movie. I know
some users who isn't into it, and I'm fine with it. I know plenty of
people who isn't into the sequels, and I'm fine with it.
Not from wha others have seen.
Obviously ignorance.
I only disagreed with their claims that are outside of the personal head. That's not the same as attacking some FOR disliking it.
I "stalked" your group? All I did was go in it and complain (While you
allowed people to give an opinion), plus if I agreed then you stalked a
fan group... first too.
Namely by stalking and replying too nearly every new comment in the group.
Because they were replying to me.
Yet, you were forcing that group on other people.
Plus, if you dictate/(using your personal opinion as "fact") about an
art style not yours, then people will disagree and argue you back
showing a legit critique argument. People debate other reviewers before.
And I'm not alone on that.
Umm, showing 'my own' arguments doesn't make me an 'egotistical'.
*egotist,
and by pretending that your views are right, it shows you're only
reliant on yourself for input, hence, you're an egotist.
But they are right. Debaters try to argue before, people disagree in reviewing people, it's a natural thing.
Arguing a legit critique is a fair thing.
People do this all the time.
Again, assumptions =/= fact. You don't know if they are true or not.
And guess what? They are.
Glad to see you admit you make sob stories.
No I meant that they are true.
Yet, despite that the past is the past and that I don't do that
anymore, it doesn't sound like a 'personal insult' as it's not name
calling.
Right, you just do other stuff that balances it all out.
Oh you mean the things you think that are "faults" but really isn't?
Even no matter how many times you get exposed for your bigotry of that?
No, it's your own faults which you refuse to fix yourself on.
No, it's not my own 'faults', it's you and the other trolls who
choose to attack people for defending freedom of expression or your own and the other trolls for
choosing to attack people for expressing themselves.
The last part, that's what you exactly do to me.
No, not really.
"*Forces opinions* Umm I'm not forcing, you are seeing things!"
You started it by that because none of those interfere with your
life, or other lives. But you still posted offensive asshole content
about them for your own beliefs.
TRANSLATION: "YOU'VE HERT MAH FELLINGS!"
In other words, you admit it.
Plus, those people find your offensive shit
disturbing, so stop. Hehehe
What I did. Was just me defending them because you are acting like a
jerk to them. You treat them like shit for your own beliefs, etc.
And you don't treat everyone else like shit because they don't think like you?
If they treat me like shit, I'll treat them like shit back.
Again, you are blaming justice again.
In terms of beliefs, just like you have beliefs, I have beliefs..
Though, one of them has a fair moral concerned, and that's mine; who
defends others for who they are against things that already start it.
"EVEN IF THEY PROVE TO BE THREATS TO SOCIETY!"
Having a vore sexuality, a feet sexuality, or any other fetish that it's self isn't hurting someone is not a threat.
Nor is wearing a fursuit in public.
Nor is having sex in private by CONSENT.
Just because society has some prejudice hatred left, doesn't mean it's a threat.
I'm not special. Nobody is, but some things are problems and some things are not problems.
Example problems: You attack someone (With delusional reasoning too) for their personal spirituality.
Which of course means, I criticized you and you had a spasmodic attack.
*Drinks*
You attack me, and disguised it as "criticism". Is that term supposed to make you look "cool"?
The only person who thinks they are special than everyone else is you.
Here is an example of what's fair:
"I don't like this kind of stuff, not my kind of thing, I won't judge the right audiences who do" *moving on*
Then here is you: "I
don't like this, therefor the artists who loves what he/she is doing is
doing it wrong because I don't like it. It must be my kind of style or
else it sucks to them and everyone else."
I'm not a douchebag.
"But I'll be dammed if you criticize the artist I see in my dreams."
*Drinks*
Then I will criticize that knuckles should be a 90s style and never use a modern style then because I personally don't like the new one.
If you say I'm wrong, then you can't take criticism, therefor a problem!!
*sarcasm*
Seriously though, stop dictating other people not you, it's their work, not yours. If you judge out of personal opinion, then you will be considered biases.
Plus if certain people won't be my friend for being a furry, that is their own fault. I can't change myself you know.
Right, because then people would actually want to be your friend. But as is, nobody likes you.
Actually I have friends.
Maybe nobody likes you, you fucking water crushing poor skilled shitty slob.
Face it, if you attack someone for a victimless action, THEY are a
victim. Considering what you do, is NOT victimless and is the start of a
victim creation.
Sure, even though your behavior proves otherwise.
A victim standing up back is different.
If someone had sex with a dog without consent, then that's different. I
thought you were just talking about those actual zoosexuals who only
faps but never does it? Or... is this just another one of those 'fear based' reasoning?
No,
you're not misreading that, wwwarea actually supports beastiality. How
long will it be before he heads out into the woods to find a wolf to
rape?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
Also, when it comes to those actual people who does 'fap', believe me, their is A LOT of those people. When it comes to fantasy and I bet a lot of those don't actually have the same desire to an actual full 'animal'.
It's not illegal for someone to have that fantasy, and it's not even illegal to draw them (according to some research I've found).
Yet, "rape a wolf", is that even possible? (If you know what I mean)
Also, I don't support bestiality. I don't do that, and I don't even want to have sex with a non-human animal on this bloody planet.
Also I found this comment:
"He actual said raping a dog is a victimless crime?!? Is he high?!?"
I think REM might be misreading my older message.
I was talking about those people who JUST FAP, not actually touch a real dog or any other real animal on this planet (except humans, duh).. Even though the consenting argument exist, but still.
--
PART 3
Ok, this should be it for now. On the plus side, wwwarea's a massive
gold mine, so with every commentary, more interesting facts could be
drained from him.
Keep wishing buddy.
Well if they blame a person that starts it, then they still are.
Right... fetish people have diplomatic immunity, apparently.
Umm what? And are you saying that someone is "better" if they "don't" have a 'fetish'?
Bigot.
It's not illegal to express it (Unless I mean it depends where,
like having actual sex in public for example), though it depends how.
Also,
while people bringing you out for a fetish isn't right about you and
isn't really real criticism, I will say the real fault (criticism stuff)
is people who judge others for being themselves. Those who don't like
it can ignore it, and move on. Or get used to it just like how some
others got used to 'human kissing'.
If that ever happened, that's their own fault. Hating me for something harmless.
Or, you know, being a total douchebag to everyone who doesn't think like you and refusing to learn your mistakes.
Face it REM, it's their fault. I'm not acting like a "douchebag", you are though.
What actions? The stuff that isn't even wrong even though you think it "is"?
When
I argue you did something wrong, at least I based it off morality
involving the true "moral": Do not interfere with others."
In
fact, in the USA, law is usually supposed to protect Freedom of each
individual (At least that's what I believe for this country?), but you
can't have too much freedom or else you violate another.
And lo and behold, you've violated your own freedom, far too many times.
What. The. FUCK?!
You can't dictate someone's freedom and say "You violated your own". That doesn't make sense.
If someone does something they like personally, then that's not a violation, it's their freedom stuff.
Seriously how twisted and idiotic can you be?
Law is also meant to be about protecting OTHER PEOPLE FROM ANOTHER.
You have to know that agreeing to finding out
where someone lives then trying to gather information from public is
kinda like doxxing right?
And you do realize that posting your
name, state, country and other shit on certain websites where anyone
could see it is just a tad bit reckless, right?
Still doesn't change the fact that you tried to gather that information for the agreement to 'track me down'.
Face it buddy, admit it.
I'll
admit, you revealed your name, your state and city on certain accounts
you own, and I'll admit that, like everything else, you refuse to learn
when you've done something wrong.
You don't get it. Your purpose of gathering that stuff was to attempt to track me down, which is part of doxxing.
And maybe you did the same thing for me then. If you didn't do any tracking home stuff down, then I guess I didn't either.
I don't remember updating it for that.
Doesn't matter that much. I don't live there.
That's what I saw. Rather than continue to deny it, just accept it and move on.
But I don't remember it. You can't force me to admit something I do not remember.
Yet, EVEN if that name was real, I can always legally change it. 
Receptionist: Ok, why do you wish to change your name.
wwwarea: Some evil cyberbullies hurt my feelings!
Receptionist: Have you tried ignoring-
wwwarea: IGNORING DOESN'T DO SHIT! I'M A SPECIAL BOY!
Immature.
Face it, stalkers are dangerous, they hurt reputations, and continue to cause other harm.
Still you were aiming to it.
"Find out where wwwarea lives" or something is what you agreed to. Face it.
Face what? The fact that you already revealed your info?
No, the fact that you tried to gather that information for the purpose of tracking me down.
By the way, if I did posted that city on Fanpop, seeing it's not their is now considered 'restricted information' doesn't it?
Not before.
But it is now. Time is now!
Maybe that "criticism" is wrong? Yet, said the guy who checked my
account much more than you, and yet, posted information from the site.
Wrong because you said so? Ok....
And your "criticism" is "criticism" and "right" because you said so? Ok....
You do the same thing. Yet, then again, I was just basing it off
the low production value and purpose of some stuff. Honestly the other
sequels did have better graphics, a more interesting story (Accept the
third one), etc.
Hate to say it, but the quality of the sequels gradually declined with each new movie. The stories weren't any better.
Actually they didn't. You aren't very good at looking at the graphics then.
Example: The third movie had super choppy animation, the forth had smoother animation.
The story of the forth had a more interesting plot, and was more inspirational.
Just because you don't think that (And you didn't even watch them) doesn't mean your right.
Also, you obviously treat your opinions as "fact" all the damn time without good arguments.
Don't you do that all the time?
Nope, I give out links, comparisons, history, etc.
You just depend on your personal bias and people around you.
Right... (I can't explain how further)
Try
looking up my name in a search bar and you're bound to get a lot of
results. Hell, there are four Peter Vecchios on Facebook.
Search it on the record criminal site you ask?
Of course you would assume I'm a criminal. Your hatred for me knows no bounds.
I thought we were both on topic about the whole criminal record thing?
I might of thought you said to search your name on it too.
I'm not so sure what you mean by 'pariah', but you are a monster. I
already explained why. It's not immature to believe that you did
something wrong by advocating pain on other people not you for your sick
twisted beliefs.
But to assume I'm a criminal, that's just plain low.
At least I didn't act it like a fact, I honestly left it as a guess didn't I?
YET, you assume I want to kill people. That's just very low.
Well not always (depending what ideas) and no, that's not true.
That's their own fault and not everyone hates me.
Whatever you like to tell yourself.
And because it's true.
Face it. It's kinda around my areas.
I learned a lot of things online, I shared it with some people and they like it.
You would've been better off in school.
No I wouldn't. Home School > Public Schools
Public Schools is a cookie cutter useless program with somewhat learning, but doesn't have everything like researching on the Internet.
Plus, you also should know that the Internet is also a great place
for research in several areas, and can contain even better learning
than the limited physical ways of learning.
Looks like you've been reading the wrong articles then.
But they aren't wrong. They contain useful information.
You on the other hand is an example of a 'wrong article'.
You do realize there are other News channels right? Plus, I would
rather discover them on my own through the Internet instead of being
possibly brainwashed by television.
Not unless you watch the right programs.
What is a "right program".
Oh wait, I know one, it's called the Internet.
Well I did. In fact, I often hate it here sometimes.
Gonna need more proof.
I can't just share where I go buddy.
Plus where is YOUR proof that I always stay in my own room?
I don't know. I always have to remain very restricted, or else if I
'by myself', I will get discriminated. So I don't think I've gotten an
expression of that yet.
It's possible they do.
It's possible they don't.
It's also funny too, you are advocating messed up things that promote suicide....
again.
Oh and if I do get discriminated for being myself, that is their own fault.
Right, if you're an asshole, it's not your fault, it's the world's fault.
But me standing up for myself and others doesn't make me an asshole.
They are the asshole though if they do that however.
I think more people need to stand up for themselves in public, and find communities in RL that will accept them.
Aka, you and only you.
Judging by the useful information on the Internet (That connects with this world and same life), that's not true.
Hell, if you want people to "leave" the room, then more RL people should be more tolerating...
Or as you put it, more tolerant of someone as unlikeable as yourself.
Keep saying that, but your opinion stinks. It's just bigotry bullshit.
Just because some bigots like you don't like me, doesn't mean I'm wrong. Doesn't mean people can't tolerate me, etc.
Again, blaming the wrong people.
Tell that to blacks and homosexuals through a time machine then.
Take a drink...
Face it, you just can't argue.
It's a fair comparison though and because the hate connects with society in general.
I blame you, and your friends because you have
the CHOICE to let go of someone and move on, but you don't and continue
to blame the victim for being concerned about this major problem.
You've
proven time and time again that you're not a victim, and what do you
know? The above statement is something you're guilty of entirely.
I feel like Peter is just going in an endless loop.
Ironic since you're doing exactly that.
Predicted.
But no, you are. You still depend on fear, popularity, and you treat personal opinion as "fact".
What "delusional" world? Though I see your world, and it's very delusional.
My
world is the real world (so of course you'd call it delusional). You
live in a world where you think you're right about everything, and
everybody could do whatever they want. It's pure anarchy in your world.
*Spins finger near head* Delusional...
If your definition of delusional is acting like a typical human being, then I'd consider that a compliment
Sorry but you are just making shit up.
You are not acting like good human being, and you never were right over me.
Seeing you attack people for their freedom shows how bigoted you are.
Not everything deserves freedom. - REM
That's why you are bigoted REM/Peter.
Depending on the prejudice of society (Just like in the darker ages) and/or of your mind to violate people's freedom.
Get out of the USA Peter. And don't ever come back.
Just like I said folks, biased and not proven.
Aren't you both?
No, I'm not.
"I think everyone should be just like me in life!"
You still can't realize that it's still a risk and harassment risk. Regardless of settings.
"EDITING STUFF IS TOO HARD FOR ME! EVERYONE ELSE MUST THINK SO!"
But I was saying that (And I did do that) it wouldn't matter, it's still risky. Just less risky maybe.
First, I like how you just ignored the other quote you posted.
Second, some people found it and they supported me..?
Or maybe they didn't.
According to some observation (The grand of all facts in this delusional world), they did.
It's an insult.
Saying 'Faggot' in general is an insult.
As
a person who is a target by you, I find it very offensive, and that
reasoning is all made up by idiotic slobs like you to call people
insulting names.
Maybe your a water bottle faggot then (And yes, I will make that up because it's no different to).
Sorry, but I don't let petty insults affect me.
Way to ignore the argument.
See folks? Peter as usual deciding that I can't have an opinion about something that catches my interest.
Not like people are prohibited from criticizing you.
*drinks*
I like how you act like trolls are an issue, but secretly you are
just on their side and give warnings to people in other words: "It's
your fault we did this to you!!!" So it's even more funny I think.
Trolls will save the internet someday.
How crazy can you get Peter?
Are you... a troll?
And no, they will not save the Internet, so far, they are just ruining it. Also from another study, trolls are consider sadistic.
Hey I'm just quoting off what the study shows!
You always think you know everything but you don't.
Don't you do that, like, all the time?
Some things are right, that you can't take.
As for spiritual beliefs, I do not think I 100% know, I just offer evidence to make the faith and beliefs stronger.
You on the other hand, you just attack those who has it and act like you know everything by personally insulting them.
Sorry buddy, but you don't know everything about history, plus their is evidence, etc.
And you don't know anything about properly functioning in the real world.
And you don't know how the world even functions.
As if you do.
But I do. I am very aware of the differences of other people, how they function, etc.
And I'm aware on how you function, my predictions of your sayings are coming more and more to pass.
Evidence is evidence, it's unfair to just discredit that just because you don't like it.
That's how the real world works. An open minded thing for people to take and wonder themselves freely.
And in your eyes, fuck everything that moves and jack off to wolves.
Again, cannot argue at all.
Plus I don't jack to real non-human animals from this planet.
I'm more furry.
How is it idiotic?
What if it's true?
"Nobody" knows but that doesn't make it idiotic to wonder and guess if
it's true or not. It's not idiotic to believe out of faith or whatever
it's called that it happened.
Ok, but what if it isn't true?
And what if it is?
Or isn't?
And just because you think it's "not" as a probably thing, doesn't mean it's concrete.
If it's unproven, people are obviously going to have faith for it.
But what if their faith proves to be ineffective?
A "what if". I do not detect a concrete argument.
Yet, not having proof it's self doesn't mean it's wrong automatically.
So stop with the 'what if other' thing. It's not concrete evidence.
In other words, stop trying to bring logic into this.
Actually it's not logic to act like something is disproved just because you can't see it.
BOTH sides need evidence.
And them bashing it doesn't mean they are right.
The theorists may not be right either.
May not be.. But what if they are?
But what if they aren't?
Predictable.
But what if they are?
So because you think (Without concrete proof), it's not likely, it's "idiotic"?
Also, it DID happen. Remember March 11th 2011?
That event was predicted BEFORE March 11th 2011 (And years ago before that).
It already happened!
What event?
The Japan Earthquake and Nuclear Reactor event.
Where were you during March 11th?
And I'm saying the Japan Earthquake and Nuclear Reactor event (That happened on March 11th) was predicted before Match 11th.
Actually everyone is normal for who they are.
Plus, you do the same thing.
Typo, there's supposed to be an "I" instead of "you".
I
don't see a red line under 'you'. :)
Just because you think it's "not" proven doesn't automatically mean he's wrong.
He could still be right.. Yet, he already had some predictions come true in some parts.
Course, screw considering negative aspects.
What?
Right back at you. I never sucked, regardless of how many trolls and bullies like you think I did.
For your last part, that doesn't even make any sense.
Really? Because you've managed to surpass everyone else.
Umm what?
Plus, that guy was hated by over 300,000 people. I'm just hated by an amount of people under 25 on your DA page.
He always stalks people, start fight with people, etc.
Something you've been doing since the beginning.
Sorry but the evidence shows that you did that.
Again, switch the "you" with an "I"
Face it Peter. Face it.
I've never meant such an incredible bigot who forces his arguable
and many holes through opinions that are not even true act this bad.
I don't have mental problems, but you do.
Oh yeah? Your behavior suggest otherwise? Oh, just because I'm not like you that automatically means I have mental problems?
What behavior? OH, you mean my rights and fair arguments?
And because of your behaviors of what you do to other people not you, that's why you have mental issues.
I do not need to explain it again do I?
You attack spirituality, you attack people's freedom, you don't believe in Freedom of Expression, you start fights with many people, you probably made someone almost die, and much more.
They are fine. LOL
Yeah, especially since they likely kicked you out of the house.
Keep talking buddy, but you are never right about me.
Maybe your family should see what you do then.
I am liked.
No, not really.
Seeing that I have friends online, etc. I am.
I am not delusional (But you are)
Keep telling yourself that.
Right back at you.
You are the one fucked up in the head.
Not in the least.
Keep telling yourself that.
You attack freedom, freedom of speech, people for who they are, etc.
I criticize stuff that could lead to rather disturbing outcomes.
*Drinks*
And maybe your common fetishes are disturbing then. Guess I will bash it and call it "criticism" then.
You always claim cyberbullying "doesn't" exist and force that as "fact".
Even though you claim your ideas are fact all the time.
So which is true then? The term existing by law, many other dictionaries?
Or your low educated opinion pretending it just doesn't exist? Because of your beliefs about people?
Advocates harassment to the point of suicidal thoughts and isn't sorry for it.
Nope. Even I was, it's better than allowing a pedophile to develop into a serious threat.
Admitted to promote suicide for someone who requested a fictional character that isn't real.
And admits to advocate harassment to the point of suicide out of fear.
How disgusting can Peter get?
Lies
You do that all the time.
Do you even know what lying mean?
Blame victims, etc.
LOL, you're no victim.
Yes I am.
You never won. You were never right about me.
The denial is strong here.
"Because I said so!" <Peter
You are just so blind because you have a little bit of supporters on DA.
If
I'm blind, then your eyes were yanked out of your sockets. Besides,
you're the same guy who treats yourself like some sort of saint.
Actually that's what you do on DA Peter.
Yet, a lot of my stuff has a lot more feedback than yours. Most of them are just not part of the fight.
Some are ignorant of your true self.
The self that defends rights and freedom of expression, and the right to question popular belief.
Some of them already know that in general and doesn't have a problem with me.
This guy is really fucked up, and of course blames the wrong person.
"I, of course, am above criticism. And don't you forget it."
*drinks*
I never seen such a huge bigot and prejudice asshole on the Internet before like this.
And I've never seen anyone who's less likable than Chris Chan or Richard Kuta.
Again, depending on popularity. Where is my 'popularity reasoning' beer?!
Yet, I am way less likable than Chris Chan, especially Richard Kuta.
Don't you ever compare me for them.
He will be hated by many physicists, scientists, and many other people.
I'm sure that those two would hate you more, since you're batshit insane. Science isn't everything.
Jesus christ. The dude is simply retarded. He needs serious mental help, quick.
Keep telling yourself that, bigot. Those people would REALLY hate you because they know that you trigger much abuse to many individuals, make people suicidal, etc.
And using "retarded" as an insult just gives them a more reason to hate you.
It's you that needs help. And always will need help.
Peace.
An overused word. You using that justifies my point of it.
1:21 AM End. - Took some breaks too.
================
End of Request.
I can't believe REM is against consenting rights.
It's already bad enough for what he does, but he just keeps getting worse, and worse.
:origin()/pre10/7a1c/th/pre/f/2015/311/e/4/unnamed_138_by_channeleven-d9fur6x.png)
:origin()/pre08/127d/th/pre/f/2015/311/c/0/unnamed_139_by_channeleven-d9fur7h.png)
:origin()/pre13/df2e/th/pre/f/2015/272/5/f/12038067_960877880645286_3197873083431316157_n_by_channeleven-d9bchxl.jpg)